Non-PPR Rank Risk Rewards Week 3

by John Bush

Non-PPR Rank Risk Rewards Week 3

Non-PPR Rank Risk Rewards Week 3 rankings are not simply numbers on a page or column. In this report, I have also included my metric based risk assessment as well as player ranking.

Also,  included are stand-alone figures that expand the concepts of Risk as I use in fantasy football.  Team landscapes of risk numbers and risk analysis of the players within the teams is shown for fine focus.

See my previous Articles for Week 3

snaps-per-minute-week-2-2018

targets-per-minute-week-2

ppr-ranks-risk-rewards-week-3

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Let’s begin with Risk. I use that term as a measure of possibilities (ceiling to floor). Each ranking in this world is a number usually an average. In 100 games played under these same conditions, a player will average at their rank (50 percentile).

What about the rare games where they scored much higher or lower? Thus a range of possibilities can exist. You use this concept to understand my rankings; I wanted to declare my view of the player’s range of possible outcomes with my rankings.

High Risk means a large set of possibilities or the distance from player ceiling to floor, Mid Risk means a narrower set of outcomes and Low Risk implies a very tight range of outcomes. See below for a visual description.


Fantasy Football Risk Metric and Analysis.

Slide23

_____________________________________________________________

Team Risk Landscape

As you stroll into my rankings, later on, I predicted that the team’s risk levels can be used to modify your rankings-based lineups or bargain hunting in DFS situations.

I simply present for each team a count of their ranked players who are in the Week and generate the counts of High, Mid or Low-risk players.

FYI to finish my week’s picture

  • Use game scripts, DAPS, Risk, Range Skew and rankings.
  • All the data predictions to move to a holistic opinion!
  • Blindly following numbers is not the best way!

Week 3 Team Risk Landscape

The table shows each team’s Player Counts for Risk Categories. I present an Area View of the Tabular Data and finally a focused view of the Team with High to Low Counts of Risky players. 

Each Team in the following table is colorized to note the Teams which have the high, medium and low riskier players.  Good for tie-breakers in DFS and lineups.

Slide1


Team Risk Landscape

The graph shows each team’s Player Counts for Risk Categories of High and Low. I present a Landscape View of the Tabular Data and finally a focused view of the Team with High to Low Counts of Risky players.

Slide2

We see that for the week these teams are the riskiest. SEA, GB, MIA, DEN, TB, TEN and WAS. These teams have the highest level of HIGH and MID risk players ranked. Thus the known risky teams can be avoided. This can at least get data to fantasy players to pause and think about why the high risk?

  • New Players?
  • Unproven Players?
  • Poor Matchup? 

The low-risk teams in week 3 are KC, NYG, MIN, HOU, CAR. OAK and NO.  Therefore,  players should consider the reasons for being a low-risk team this week

These rankings are closer to reality in lower risk teams than in the higher risk teams. Good for DFS, Lineups and drop and adds this week. Please use the rankings as a best case and modify my DFS and Lineups based on the other factors of game scripts, DAPs, and Risk. Good Luck!


Defense and Special Teams

Non-PPR Rank Risk Rewards Week 3 Slide4


Kickers

Non-PPR Rank Risk Rewards Week 3 Slide6


Quarterbacks

Non-PPR Rank Risk Rewards Week 3 Slide21

Slide22


Non_PPR RBs

Non-PPR Rank Risk Rewards Week 3 Slide24

Non-PPR Rank Risk Rewards Week 3 Slide25

Non-PPR Rank Risk Rewards Week 3 Slide26


Non_PPR TEs

Slide28

Slide29


Non_PPR WRs

Non-PPR Rank Risk Rewards Week 3 Slide31

Non-PPR Rank Risk Rewards Week 3 Slide32

Non-PPR Rank Risk Rewards Week 3 Slide33

slide347.jpg


TEAM View PPR Positions and Players Rankings and Assessments of Risk

These figures of teams present a Rankings and Risk landscape. Use these metrics to focus down at a matchup level. Fringe players may be used in great matchups vs avoided in poorer situations. 

I will be adding My Matchups Analysis later in the week. 

Slide69

Slide70

Slide71

Slide72

Slide73

Slide74

Slide75

Slide76

Slide77

Slide78

Slide79

slide802.jpg

Slide81

Slide82

Slide83

Slide84

Slide85

Slide86

Slide87

Slide88

Slide89

slide902.jpg

Slide91

Slide92

Slide93

Slide94

Slide95

Slide96

Slide97

Slide98

Slide99

Slide100

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *