by John Bush

Non_PPR Ranks Risk Skew Week 6

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Non_PPR Ranks Risk Skew Week 6  rankings are not simply numbers on a page or column. I have to include my metric based risk assessment and a new metric based range skew analysis that I have developed this summer.

I have also included two stand-alone figures that expand the concepts of Risk as I use in fantasy football and the idea of a Ranking Range Skew number. I present the Team landscapes of risk numbers and risk analysis of the positions within the teams.

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Let’s begin with Risk. I use that term as a measure of possibilities. Each ranking in this world is a number usually an average. In 100 games played under these same conditions, a player will average at their rank (50 percentile). What about the rare games where they scored much higher or lower? Thus a range of possibilities can exist. You use to understand my rankings; I wanted to declare my view of the player’s range of possible outcomes.

High Risk means a large set of possibilities, Mid Risk means a narrower set of outcomes and Low Risk implies a very tight range of outcomes. See Figure 1 for a visual description.

Figure 1. Fantasy Football Risk Metric and Analysis.

_____________________________________________________________

Figure 2. Outcome Range Skew

I have divided the positions into groups and present my PPR based rankings with risk and Range Skew from high to low rankings (Green to Red).

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Week 6 Team Risk Landscape

As you stroll into my rankings, later on, I predicted that the team’s risk levels can be used to modify your rankings based lineups or bargain hunting in DFS situations. In Figure 3, I simply present for each team a count of their ranked players who are in the Week 6, High, Mid or Low-risk players.

FYI to finish my week’s picture

• I consider game scripts, DAPS, Risk, Range Skew and rankings.
• I use all the data predictions to move to a holistic opinion!
• Blindly following numbers is not the best way!

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Figure 3 to 4. Week 6 Team Risk Landscape

Figure 3 shows each team’s Player Counts for Risk Catergories. I present an Area View of the Tabular Data and finally a focused view of the Team’s with High to Low Counts of Risky players.

---

We see that for this week, CHI, TB, and LAR have the highest level of HIGH risky players ranked. This can at least get players data to pause and think about why the high risk?

The low-risk teams in week 6 are JAC, IND, and WAS. I think my rankings are closer to reality than in the higher risk teams.

Good for DFS, Lineups and drop and adds this week!

_____________________________________________________________

Non_PPR Ranks, Risk, Skew Week 6

I use the ranking as a best case and modify my DFS and Lineups based on the other factors of game scripts, DAPs, Risk, and Range Skew. Good Luck!

Defense and Special Teams

_____________________________________________________________

Kickers

_____________________________________________________________

Quarterbacks

_____________________________________________________________

Non_PPR RBs

_____________________________________________________________

Non_PPR TEs

_____________________________________________________________

Non_PPR WRs

Related Posts

• 
  Course History: Travelers Championship
• 
  NASCAR DFS: Monkey Knife Fight Picks for the Ally 400
• 
  PGA DFS and Monkey Knife Fight Picks: US Open