By John Bush

Team Targets Per Minute Week 7

Team Targets Per Minute Week 7 report looks at the use of weekly target numbers by position, player, and by the team. This metric is useful in fantasy football especially in PPR scoring formats where receptions count.  The tables/graphs below provide target data for the running back, wide receiver, and tight end positions.

Green/Blue colorization of the weekly targets and targets per minute numbers highlights players at the top of the position group, i.e., many targets per minute, while red colorization of the weekly target numbers denotes players toward the bottom of the position group, i.e., fewer targets per minute of play.

Compare and contrast the data and envision this week’s game scripts by using all your resources including this one.

See my snaps reports click link

team-snaps-per-minute-week-7

player-snaps-per…nute-week-7-2018

——————————————————————–

Targets Weeks 1 to 7 with Weekly, Total Targets, and DIFFs

Many players only look at raw target player metrics and that is it. These data expand that vision via team level. Players are a product of the Team and should have that as a component of your analysis. 

Below I have a sortable table** that lists the following:

• NUM
• TEAMs
• Team Targets in Weeks 1 to 7
• Total Average Targets for Team
• First 4 vs Last 3 Games Team Target Averages
• Last 3 Games Average Points Scored
• DIFF Targets differences in the last two games

** Note the NUM column is presorted by Average Team Targets. 

Num	Team	Week 1	Week 2	Week 3	Week 4	Week 5	Week 6	Week 7	Team	AVG of Targets	First4 vs Last3 DIFF	Last 3 Game Points	DIFF
1	IND	52	31	39	61	58	42	23	IND	43.7	-4.8	31.7	-19
2	BAL	37	53	37	40	57	37	37	BAL	42.6	1.9	17.7	0
3	PIT	41	60	38	46	27	43		PIT	42.5	-11.3	27.7	16
4	GB	36	40	43	40	50	44		GB	42.2	7.3	26	-6
5	MIN	35	48	55	49	36	32	38	MIN	41.9	-11.4	29	6
6	TB	28	33	50	38		40	52	TB	40.2	8.8	21.7	12
7	JAX	32	45	33	38	60	26	40	JAX	39.1	5.0	9.3	14
8	PHI	31	47	37	50	32	36	37	PHI	38.6	-6.3	24	1
9	CLE	39	30	36	41	42	45	33	CLE	38.0	3.5	16.3	-12
10	NYG	36	43	29	41	36	43	36	NYG	37.7	1.1	21.3	-7
11	OAK	39	32	37	57	31	30		OAK	37.7	-10.8	19.3	-1
12	ATL	36	28	34	38	44	41	36	ATL	36.7	6.3	24.7	-5
13	CIN	28	40	45	41	30	41	31	CIN	36.6	-4.5	19.3	-10
14	DET	51	52	35	29	25		22	DET	35.7	-18.3	29	-3
15	NO	43	35	49	30	28		28	NO	35.5	-11.3	33.3	0
16	NE	39	35	25	35	44	35	35	NE	35.4	4.5	39.7	0
17	DEN	37	35	33	33	51	38	19	DEN	35.1	1.5	27	-19
18	KC	25	28	37	43	35	36	36	KC	34.3	2.4	38.3	0
19	CHI	34	34	35	25		30	46	CHI	34.0	6.0	35.7	16
20	CAR	25	45	24		33	38	37	CAR	33.7	4.7	23.7	-1
21	HOU	32	28	38	40	44	26	23	HOU	33.0	-3.5	19.7	-3
22	SF	32	23	30	36	53	23	27	SF	32.0	4.1	26	4
23	WAS	29	44	20		38	34	23	WAS	31.3	0.7	20.7	-11
24	LAC	50	27	30	39	26	21	25	LAC	31.1	-12.5	28	4
25	LAR	33	32	36	32	32	28	24	LAR	31.0	-5.3	31.7	-4
26	NYJ	21	41	30	32	22	29	40	NYJ	30.7	-0.7	31	11
27	DAL	29	23	34	27	29	26	34	DAL	28.9	1.4	24.3	8
28	MIA	28	23	24	24	32	39	30	MIA	28.6	8.9	23	-9
29	BUF	32	33	22	33	19	29	31	BUF	28.4	-3.7	10.3	2
30	ARI	31	23	24	25	18	31	36	ARI	26.9	2.6	18.3	5
31	SEA	33	33	26	25	20	23		SEA	26.7	-7.8	19.3	3
32	TEN	37	20	21	40	21	14	32	TEN	26.4	-7.2	10.3	18

---

High vs Lows Average Targets 

The table below lines up the highs and lows in league average targets. I used color-coded to assign teams a target type. Blue colorization is very high in average targets vs red annotated the bottom teams. 

In PPR especially, hard to back any WR depth in poor targeting teams. I do monitor trends for changes. 

---

League Average Targets vs Last 2 Game DIFFs, Early vs Later DIFFs and Points Scored (Team Successes). 

Targets are great metrics but changes occur and some teams are efficient in their scoring. Let’s see the metrics here. 

• IND -19 DIFF and some landscape level drop off in targets but very successful. 
• BAL Poor Efficiency? Targeting is great but where are the points? 
• PIT Nice Scoring with recent increases but lost -11 over the season. 
• GB Average good scoring team
• MIN good scoring but has seen landscape level -11 drops in targets 
• TB Poor Scoring But increasing targets recently. Expect improvements
• JAX Very Poor Success! Any hope? Has improved recently. 
• PHI Ok scoring but nice recent targets
• CLE poor scoring and targets recently.
• NYG Poor Scoring. Targeting dropping
• OAK Poor Scoring Recent dropping targets
• ATL Good Scoring Targets ok 
• CIN Weak scoring and targeting drops. 

You should complete the comments as your homework!

---

Graphical View of Team Total Targets vs DIFF

This graph lets us focus on the landscape view of targets, change in targeting this season and success! 

The pink dashed line is the league average for points scored per game last 3 games. Teams above are successful vs unsuccessful below the average line. 

Those teams below the ZERO axis (left side axis) for seasonal targets early vs late. Red bars below vs above for team improving in targeting. 

Improving Teams GB, TB, CLE,, ATL, NE, CHI, CAR, and MIA

Declining Teams in targeting are PIT, MIN, OAK, DET, NO, LAC, SEA, and TEN

---

TPM with Weekly TPM Metrics vs Average TPM, TPM Rankings, Speed and Balance

This mega table contains:

• NUM
• TEAMs
• POS
• Week 1 to 7
• DIFF
• First 4 vs Last 3 Games
• TEAMs
• POS
• Average of Target_Min
• % Usage in Team
• Pos Rankings vs League
• Pos Balance within the Team

I recommend using these metrics for a Team Targeting Diagnosis.

It’s that time of the season to make a change. If you are 3-4 or less,  team depth is not important. Winning now is everything. You must move from stockpiling to winning now! Trades etc are now! Do not continue to do the same things to lose again. 

The First 4 vs 3 metric compares the early season vs recent seasonal Team targeting. We are looking for improving teams. Caution for declining teams. 

% Usage is a metric measuring how does a Team distribute targets to its 3 positions (RB, TE, and WRs)

Pos Rankings are a scaled 100 to 0 ranking within all of a position as compared to the league. What team is using their RBs the most via targeting vs the least? 

Positional balance is another way to see the Team positional distribution. It’s an internal metric relative to the team. 

Num	TEAMs	POS	Week 1	Week 2	Week 3	Week 4	Week 5	Week 6	Week 7	DIFF	First 4 vs Last 3	TEAMs	POS	Avg TPM	% Usage	POS Rankings	Pos Balance in Team
1	ARI	RB	0.595	0.271	0.211	0.177	0.202	0.194	0.206	0.011	-0.113	ARI	RB	0.143	29.2%	52.4%	-4.1%
2	ARI	TE	0.274	0.232	0.211	0.142	0.051	0.272	0.137	-0.135	-0.062	ARI	TE	0.147	30.0%	47.3%	6.4%
3	ARI	WR	0.549	0.387	0.592	0.567	0.657	0.738	0.891	0.153	0.238	ARI	WR	0.199	40.8%	34.5%	20.5%
4
5	ATL	RB	0.251	0.168	0.239	0.205	0.194	0.126	0.186	0.059	-0.047	ATL	RB	0.081	20.0%	14.0%	-13.3%
6	ATL	TE	0.144	0.202	0.170	0.103	0.454	0.316	0.155	-0.161	0.153	ATL	TE	0.129	31.9%	53.1%	5.3%
7	ATL	WR	0.898	0.572	0.750	0.992	0.778	0.853	0.774	-0.079	-0.001	ATL	WR	0.194	48.1%	64.4%	22.8%
8
9	BAL	RB	0.199	0.288	0.265	0.114	0.438	0.080	0.264	0.184	0.045	BAL	RB	0.110	27.8%	46.6%	-5.5%
10	BAL	TE	0.369	0.288	0.165	0.341	0.303	0.240	0.189	-0.051	-0.047	BAL	TE	0.086	21.8%	22.4%	-2.2%
11	BAL	WR	0.482	0.812	0.794	0.681	1.180	0.665	0.944	0.279	0.237	BAL	WR	0.199	50.3%	73.7%	22.1%
12
13	BUF	RB	0.202	0.446	0.140	0.277	0.118	0.182	0.450	0.268	-0.016	BUF	RB	0.113	34.2%	73.3%	0.9%
14	BUF	TE	0.283	0.297	0.112	0.317	0.089	0.182	0.262	0.081	-0.075	BUF	TE	0.091	27.4%	39.3%	5.5%
15	BUF	WR	0.808	0.483	0.364	0.713	0.355	0.515	0.450	-0.065	-0.152	BUF	WR	0.127	38.4%	24.7%	12.0%
16
17	CAR	RB	0.294	0.561	0.088		0.169	0.325	0.243	-0.082	-0.069	CAR	RB	0.210	40.6%	100.0%	7.3%
18	CAR	TE	0.131	0.099	0.147		0.169	0.366	0.202	-0.164	0.120	CAR	TE	0.139	27.0%	38.0%	7.2%
19	CAR	WR	0.392	0.825	0.472		0.592	0.854	1.052	0.198	0.270	CAR	WR	0.167	32.4%	0.2%	12.1%
20
21	CHI	RB	0.300	0.145	0.193	0.319		0.329	0.431	0.102	0.141	CHI	RB	0.123	28.6%	49.7%	-4.8%
22	CHI	TE	0.270	0.116	0.138	0.142		0.165	0.365	0.200	0.098	CHI	TE	0.149	34.8%	61.9%	11.0%
23	CHI	WR	0.450	0.727	0.633	0.425		0.494	0.730	0.235	0.053	CHI	WR	0.157	36.6%	17.5%	13.0%
24
25	CIN	RB	0.294	0.251	0.345	0.265	0.229	0.279	0.190	-0.089	-0.056	CIN	RB	0.168	34.3%	73.6%	1.0%
26	CIN	TE	0.184	0.314	0.422	0.198	0.098	0.279	0.114	-0.165	-0.116	CIN	TE	0.095	19.3%	14.6%	-2.6%
27	CIN	WR	0.551	0.691	0.958	0.893	0.654	1.077	0.875	-0.202	0.095	CIN	WR	0.228	46.4%	57.6%	24.3%
28
29	CLE	RB	0.192	0.110	0.162	0.232	0.165	0.176	0.222	0.046	0.014	CLE	RB	0.090	19.8%	13.2%	-13.5%
30	CLE	TE	0.192	0.329	0.097	0.331	0.429	0.458	0.222	-0.236	0.132	CLE	TE	0.137	30.3%	48.1%	3.5%
31	CLE	WR	0.552	0.659	0.907	0.794	0.791	0.951	0.777	-0.174	0.112	CLE	WR	0.226	49.9%	72.0%	19.8%
32
33	DAL	RB	0.170	0.216	0.293	0.165	0.258	0.052	0.206	0.155	-0.039	DAL	RB	0.136	40.4%	98.8%	7.0%
34	DAL	TE	0.170	0.072	0.293	0.198	0.222	0.103	0.275	0.172	0.016	DAL	TE	0.078	23.3%	26.8%	3.4%
35	DAL	WR	0.646	0.540	0.660	0.529	0.591	0.515	0.688	0.173	0.004	DAL	WR	0.123	36.4%	16.4%	16.8%
36
37	DEN	RB	0.142	0.111	0.336	0.206	0.450	0.403	0.065	-0.338	0.107	DEN	RB	0.095	22.4%	23.8%	-11.0%
38	DEN	TE	0.171	0.333	0.235	0.330	0.225	0.403	0.032	-0.370	-0.047	DEN	TE	0.115	27.1%	38.4%	1.2%
39	DEN	WR	0.740	0.850	0.538	0.825	0.965	0.725	0.519	-0.206	-0.002	DEN	WR	0.215	50.5%	74.5%	24.1%
40
41	DET	RB	0.372	0.624	0.229	0.205	0.188		0.119	-0.069	-0.205	DET	RB	0.116	28.9%	51.2%	-4.4%
42	DET	TE	0.112	0.066	0.076	0.171			0.149	0.149	0.042	DET	TE	0.057	14.3%	0.0%	-9.4%
43	DET	WR	1.414	1.019	0.586	0.616	0.750		0.386	-0.364	-0.340	DET	WR	0.227	56.7%	100.0%	31.5%
44
45	GB	RB	0.188	0.135	0.356	0.117	0.300	0.225		-0.075	0.064	GB	RB	0.088	18.9%	9.6%	-14.4%
46	GB	TE	0.188	0.203	0.259	0.234	0.390	0.418		0.028	0.183	GB	TE	0.141	30.3%	48.3%	3.3%
47	GB	WR	0.976	0.563	0.776	0.818	0.810	0.771		-0.039	0.007	GB	WR	0.236	50.7%	75.3%	26.0%
48
49	HOU	RB	0.104	0.067	0.286	0.085	0.273	0.222	0.135	-0.087	0.075	HOU	RB	0.098	23.3%	27.8%	-10.0%
50	HOU	TE	0.312	0.101	0.286	0.114	0.365	0.222		-0.222	0.090	HOU	TE	0.093	22.3%	23.7%	-3.3%
51	HOU	WR	0.694	0.776	0.980	0.937	0.699	0.519	0.642	0.124	-0.227	HOU	WR	0.228	54.4%	90.4%	28.8%
52
53	IND	RB	0.366	0.225	0.356	0.495	0.339	0.261	0.180	-0.081	-0.100	IND	RB	0.123	22.5%	24.5%	-10.8%
54	IND	TE	0.488	0.338	0.610	0.495	0.555	0.479	0.270	-0.209	-0.048	IND	TE	0.190	34.7%	61.6%	8.9%
55	IND	WR	0.732	0.600	1.017	1.527	0.894	1.089	0.240	-0.848	-0.228	IND	WR	0.235	42.8%	42.7%	18.4%
56
57	JAX	RB	0.339	0.390	0.404	0.188	0.403	0.331	0.296	-0.035	0.013	JAX	RB	0.138	30.3%	56.8%	-3.0%
58	JAX	TE	0.237	0.228	0.184	0.242	0.550	0.236	0.066	-0.170	0.061	JAX	TE	0.124	27.2%	38.9%	4.0%
59	JAX	WR	0.508	0.845	0.625	0.591	1.246	0.661	0.953	0.292	0.311	JAX	WR	0.194	42.5%	41.4%	22.8%
60
61	KC	RB	0.117	0.072	0.233	0.114	0.122	0.419	0.267	-0.152	0.136	KC	RB	0.075	16.6%	0.0%	-16.8%
62	KC	TE	0.235	0.359	0.433	0.426	0.306	0.377	0.208	-0.170	-0.066	KC	TE	0.213	47.3%	100.0%	19.5%
63	KC	WR	0.626	0.575	0.566	0.681	0.642	0.713	0.593	-0.120	0.037	KC	WR	0.163	36.1%	15.5%	11.0%
64
65	LAC	RB	0.523	0.303	0.272	0.403	0.202	0.158	0.325	0.167	-0.147	LAC	RB	0.156	39.4%	94.9%	6.1%
66	LAC	TE	0.145	0.121	0.233	0.217	0.087	0.063	0.162	0.099	-0.075	LAC	TE	0.079	20.0%	16.8%	-0.2%
67	LAC	WR	0.784	0.394	0.661	0.589	0.462	0.443	0.528	0.085	-0.129	LAC	WR	0.161	40.6%	33.8%	17.1%
68
69	LAR	RB	0.246	0.117	0.204	0.220	0.169	0.142	0.183	0.040	-0.032	LAR	RB	0.117	30.0%	55.5%	-3.4%
70	LAR	TE		0.117	0.117	0.073	0.237	0.114	0.091	-0.022	0.045	LAR	TE	0.068	17.5%	9.3%	-5.8%
71	LAR	WR	0.913	0.703	0.730	0.881	0.678	0.540	0.457	-0.084	-0.248	LAR	WR	0.204	52.5%	82.6%	22.9%
72
73	MIA	RB	0.132	0.176	0.186	0.215	0.374	0.236	0.342	0.105	0.140	MIA	RB	0.151	36.3%	81.9%	3.0%
74	MIA	TE	0.066	0.070	0.186	0.086	0.170	0.202	0.228	0.025	0.098	MIA	TE	0.101	24.3%	29.8%	3.0%
75	MIA	WR	0.723	0.563	0.745	0.732	0.544	0.877	0.569	-0.308	-0.027	MIA	WR	0.164	39.4%	29.0%	19.6%
76
78	MIN	RB	0.289	0.140	0.577	0.186	0.153	0.088	0.093	0.006	-0.187	MIN	RB	0.090	20.1%	14.5%	-13.2%
79	MIN	TE	0.128	0.281	0.289	0.217	0.183	0.117	0.124	0.007	-0.087	MIN	TE	0.103	23.1%	26.3%	-3.5%
80	MIN	WR	0.706	0.927	1.402	1.117	0.763	0.701	0.963	0.263	-0.229	MIN	WR	0.253	56.8%	100.0%	27.7%
81
82	NE	RB	0.545	0.376	0.482	0.304	0.544	0.277	0.402	0.125	-0.019	NE	RB	0.140	30.4%	57.2%	-3.0%
83	NE	TE	0.257	0.239	0.241	0.248	0.254	0.111		-0.111	-0.064	NE	TE	0.169	36.7%	67.9%	13.5%
84	NE	WR	0.449	0.582	0.482	0.414	0.798	0.581	0.771	0.190	0.235	NE	WR	0.151	32.9%	2.1%	9.8%
85
86	NO	RB	0.467	0.214	0.750	0.384	0.210		0.119	-0.091	-0.289	NO	RB	0.153	36.4%	82.2%	3.0%
87	NO	TE	0.180	0.184	0.228	0.192	0.180		0.269	0.088	0.029	NO	TE	0.103	24.4%	30.2%	3.2%
88	NO	WR	0.898	0.673	0.620	0.384	0.451		0.448	-0.003	-0.195	NO	WR	0.165	39.3%	28.3%	13.7%
89
90	NYG	RB	0.262	0.528	0.169	0.376	0.163	0.618	0.361	-0.257	0.047	NYG	RB	0.206	37.3%	86.2%	4.0%
91	NYG	TE	0.197	0.280	0.113	0.205	0.122	0.109	0.216	0.107	-0.049	NYG	TE	0.104	18.7%	12.9%	-2.2%
92	NYG	WR	0.722	0.528	0.535	0.821	1.181	0.836	0.722	-0.115	0.262	NYG	WR	0.243	43.9%	47.5%	20.3%
93
94	NYJ	RB	0.091	0.285	0.137	0.360	0.035	0.081	0.324	0.243	-0.072	NYJ	RB	0.094	27.1%	43.6%	-6.2%
95	NYJ	TE	0.121	0.190	0.172	0.225	0.138	0.108	0.359	0.251	0.025	NYJ	TE	0.082	23.7%	28.2%	-0.6%
96	NYJ	WR	0.423	0.823	0.721	0.855	0.588	0.594	0.755	0.161	-0.060	NYJ	WR	0.170	49.2%	68.9%	23.4%
97
98	OAK	RB	0.476	0.182	0.286	0.342	0.355	0.490		0.135	0.101	OAK	RB	0.125	28.2%	48.2%	-5.1%
99	OAK	TE	0.476	0.152	0.156	0.582	0.276	0.070		-0.206	-0.168	OAK	TE	0.171	38.5%	73.2%	14.6%
100	OAK	WR	0.286	0.638	0.519	1.026	0.592	0.490		-0.102	-0.076	OAK	WR	0.148	33.3%	3.8%	15.3%
101
102	PHI	RB	0.218	0.224	0.223	0.298	0.184	0.154	0.113	-0.040	-0.090	PHI	RB	0.101	20.8%	17.4%	-12.5%
103	PHI	TE	0.404	0.533	0.521	0.529	0.478	0.308	0.453	0.146	-0.084	PHI	TE	0.215	44.4%	91.1%	18.0%
104	PHI	WR	0.342	0.561	0.174	0.827	0.514	0.646	0.482	-0.164	0.072	PHI	WR	0.169	34.8%	10.1%	13.2%
105
106	PIT	RB	0.156	0.218	0.198	0.289	0.137	0.200		0.063	-0.046	PIT	RB	0.150	30.0%	55.7%	-3.3%
107	PIT	TE	0.130	0.311	0.231	0.248	0.172	0.487		0.315	0.099	PIT	TE	0.113	22.6%	24.7%	-0.7%
108	PIT	WR	0.782	1.336	0.824	1.362	0.618	0.515		-0.103	-0.509	PIT	WR	0.236	47.4%	61.6%	23.2%
109
110	SEA	RB	0.442	0.273	0.092	0.128	0.131	0.159		0.028	-0.089	SEA	RB	0.082	25.3%	35.9%	-8.1%
111	SEA	TE	0.282	0.391	0.244	0.096	0.164	0.032		-0.132	-0.155	SEA	TE	0.110	34.0%	59.4%	9.1%
112	SEA	WR	0.603	0.625	0.458	0.576	0.361	0.541		0.180	-0.115	SEA	WR	0.132	40.8%	34.5%	19.0%
113
114	SF	RB	0.139	0.338	0.267	0.330	0.348	0.104	0.295	0.191	-0.020	SF	RB	0.096	24.4%	32.3%	-8.9%
115	SF	TE	0.312	0.203	0.267	0.330	0.174	0.208	0.331	0.124	-0.040	SF	TE	0.166	42.2%	84.6%	17.0%
116	SF	WR	0.659	0.237	0.467	0.661	0.796	0.485	0.368	-0.117	0.044	SF	WR	0.131	33.4%	4.2%	16.0%
117
118	TB	RB	0.031	0.205	0.236	0.128		0.247	0.121	-0.126	0.034	TB	RB	0.075	18.7%	8.4%	-14.7%
119	TB	TE	0.156	0.164	0.405	0.256		0.212	0.546	0.334	0.134	TB	TE	0.109	27.2%	38.7%	0.1%
120	TB	WR	0.684	0.986	1.046	0.832		0.952	0.910	-0.043	0.044	TB	WR	0.216	54.2%	89.4%	25.9%
121
122	TEN	RB	0.304	0.033	0.122	0.376	0.191	0.134	0.226	0.092	-0.025	TEN	RB	0.107	30.7%	58.6%	-2.6%
123	TEN	TE	0.406	0.066	0.122			0.134	0.141	0.008	-0.060	TEN	TE	0.087	25.0%	32.1%	1.9%
124	TEN	WR	0.541	0.560	0.397	0.992	0.611	0.357	0.537	0.180	-0.121	TEN	WR	0.154	44.3%	48.8%	18.2%
125
126	WAS	RB	0.262	0.510	0.069		0.412	0.113	0.226	0.113	-0.030	WAS	RB	0.133	33.9%	71.8%	0.6%
127	WAS	TE	0.157	0.270	0.309		0.187	0.339	0.129	-0.210	-0.027	WAS	TE	0.127	32.3%	54.4%	10.3%
128	WAS	WR	0.341	0.540	0.309		0.823	0.508	0.388	-0.120	0.177	WAS	WR	0.132	33.8%	5.9%	22.5%
129

---

Team Positions TPM Sorted High to Low With Speed and Team Balance

In these tables take from the above sortable database, I present a color-coded list of teams within positions for Average TPM. Finding Teams highest in positions targeting has to be useful data for waiver wires, add/drops and trades.  Dynasty players might modify their plans to go with a Team’s flow. 

Each Positional Block presents:

• Sortable table.

• Colorized Table for Static Viewing

• Graphical Plot of the Team Landscape of TPM, %USAGE, Pos Rankings, and Positional Balance

---

 Running Back

TEAMs	POS	Week 1	Week 2	Week 3	Week 4	Week 5	Week 6	Week 7	DIFF	First 4 vs Last 3	TEAMs	POS	Avg TPM	% Usage	POS Rankings	Pos Balance in Team
CAR	RB	0.294	0.561	0.088		0.169	0.325	0.243	-0.082	-0.069	CAR	RB	0.210	40.6%	100.0%	7.3%
DAL	RB	0.170	0.216	0.293	0.165	0.258	0.052	0.206	0.155	-0.039	DAL	RB	0.136	40.4%	98.8%	7.0%
LAC	RB	0.523	0.303	0.272	0.403	0.202	0.158	0.325	0.167	-0.147	LAC	RB	0.156	39.4%	94.9%	6.1%
NYG	RB	0.262	0.528	0.169	0.376	0.163	0.618	0.361	-0.257	0.047	NYG	RB	0.206	37.3%	86.2%	4.0%
NO	RB	0.467	0.214	0.750	0.384	0.210		0.119	-0.091	-0.289	NO	RB	0.153	36.4%	82.2%	3.0%
MIA	RB	0.132	0.176	0.186	0.215	0.374	0.236	0.342	0.105	0.140	MIA	RB	0.151	36.3%	81.9%	3.0%
CIN	RB	0.294	0.251	0.345	0.265	0.229	0.279	0.190	-0.089	-0.056	CIN	RB	0.168	34.3%	73.6%	1.0%
BUF	RB	0.202	0.446	0.140	0.277	0.118	0.182	0.450	0.268	-0.016	BUF	RB	0.113	34.2%	73.3%	0.9%
WAS	RB	0.262	0.510	0.069		0.412	0.113	0.226	0.113	-0.030	WAS	RB	0.133	33.9%	71.8%	0.6%
TEN	RB	0.304	0.033	0.122	0.376	0.191	0.134	0.226	0.092	-0.025	TEN	RB	0.107	30.7%	58.6%	-2.6%
NE	RB	0.545	0.376	0.482	0.304	0.544	0.277	0.402	0.125	-0.019	NE	RB	0.140	30.4%	57.2%	-3.0%
JAX	RB	0.339	0.390	0.404	0.188	0.403	0.331	0.296	-0.035	0.013	JAX	RB	0.138	30.3%	56.8%	-3.0%
PIT	RB	0.156	0.218	0.198	0.289	0.137	0.200		0.063	-0.046	PIT	RB	0.150	30.0%	55.7%	-3.3%
LAR	RB	0.246	0.117	0.204	0.220	0.169	0.142	0.183	0.040	-0.032	LAR	RB	0.117	30.0%	55.5%	-3.4%
ARI	RB	0.595	0.271	0.211	0.177	0.202	0.194	0.206	0.011	-0.113	ARI	RB	0.143	29.2%	52.4%	-4.1%
DET	RB	0.372	0.624	0.229	0.205	0.188		0.119	-0.069	-0.205	DET	RB	0.116	28.9%	51.2%	-4.4%
CHI	RB	0.300	0.145	0.193	0.319		0.329	0.431	0.102	0.141	CHI	RB	0.123	28.6%	49.7%	-4.8%
OAK	RB	0.476	0.182	0.286	0.342	0.355	0.490		0.135	0.101	OAK	RB	0.125	28.2%	48.2%	-5.1%
BAL	RB	0.199	0.288	0.265	0.114	0.438	0.080	0.264	0.184	0.045	BAL	RB	0.110	27.8%	46.6%	-5.5%
NYJ	RB	0.091	0.285	0.137	0.360	0.035	0.081	0.324	0.243	-0.072	NYJ	RB	0.094	27.1%	43.6%	-6.2%
SEA	RB	0.442	0.273	0.092	0.128	0.131	0.159		0.028	-0.089	SEA	RB	0.082	25.3%	35.9%	-8.1%
SF	RB	0.139	0.338	0.267	0.330	0.348	0.104	0.295	0.191	-0.020	SF	RB	0.096	24.4%	32.3%	-8.9%
HOU	RB	0.104	0.067	0.286	0.085	0.273	0.222	0.135	-0.087	0.075	HOU	RB	0.098	23.3%	27.8%	-10.0%
IND	RB	0.366	0.225	0.356	0.495	0.339	0.261	0.180	-0.081	-0.100	IND	RB	0.123	22.5%	24.5%	-10.8%
DEN	RB	0.142	0.111	0.336	0.206	0.450	0.403	0.065	-0.338	0.107	DEN	RB	0.095	22.4%	23.8%	-11.0%
PHI	RB	0.218	0.224	0.223	0.298	0.184	0.154	0.113	-0.040	-0.090	PHI	RB	0.101	20.8%	17.4%	-12.5%
MIN	RB	0.289	0.140	0.577	0.186	0.153	0.088	0.093	0.006	-0.187	MIN	RB	0.090	20.1%	14.5%	-13.2%
ATL	RB	0.251	0.168	0.239	0.205	0.194	0.126	0.186	0.059	-0.047	ATL	RB	0.081	20.0%	14.0%	-13.3%
CLE	RB	0.192	0.110	0.162	0.232	0.165	0.176	0.222	0.046	0.014	CLE	RB	0.090	19.8%	13.2%	-13.5%
GB	RB	0.188	0.135	0.356	0.117	0.300	0.225		-0.075	0.064	GB	RB	0.088	18.9%	9.6%	-14.4%
TB	RB	0.031	0.205	0.236	0.128		0.247	0.121	-0.126	0.034	TB	RB	0.075	18.7%	8.4%	-14.7%
KC	RB	0.117	0.072	0.233	0.114	0.122	0.419	0.267	-0.152	0.136	KC	RB	0.075	16.6%	0.0%	-16.8%

---

The top TPM for RBs are CAR, NYG, CIN, LAC, NO, MIA, and PIT. The clear evidence is here for moving into these teams RBs in PPR. 

The opposite situations are found in KC, TB, SEA, and ATL. Consider your RB shares in these teams. 

Note the Pos Balances for the top teams. 

---

3 Tiers in the top 9 RB using teams. 

---

Tight Ends

TEAMs	POS	Week 1	Week 2	Week 3	Week 4	Week 5	Week 6	Week 7	DIFF	First 4 vs Last 3	TEAMs	POS	Avg TPM	% Usage	POS Rankings	Pos Balance in Team
KC	TE	0.235	0.359	0.433	0.426	0.306	0.377	0.208	-0.170	-0.066	KC	TE	0.213	47.3%	100.0%	19.5%
PHI	TE	0.404	0.533	0.521	0.529	0.478	0.308	0.453	0.146	-0.084	PHI	TE	0.215	44.4%	91.1%	18.0%
SF	TE	0.312	0.203	0.267	0.330	0.174	0.208	0.331	0.124	-0.040	SF	TE	0.166	42.2%	84.6%	17.0%
OAK	TE	0.476	0.152	0.156	0.582	0.276	0.070		-0.206	-0.168	OAK	TE	0.171	38.5%	73.2%	14.6%
NE	TE	0.257	0.239	0.241	0.248	0.254	0.111		-0.111	-0.064	NE	TE	0.169	36.7%	67.9%	13.5%
CHI	TE	0.270	0.116	0.138	0.142		0.165	0.365	0.200	0.098	CHI	TE	0.149	34.8%	61.9%	11.0%
IND	TE	0.488	0.338	0.610	0.495	0.555	0.479	0.270	-0.209	-0.048	IND	TE	0.190	34.7%	61.6%	8.9%
SEA	TE	0.282	0.391	0.244	0.096	0.164	0.032		-0.132	-0.155	SEA	TE	0.110	34.0%	59.4%	9.1%
WAS	TE	0.157	0.270	0.309		0.187	0.339	0.129	-0.210	-0.027	WAS	TE	0.127	32.3%	54.4%	10.3%
ATL	TE	0.144	0.202	0.170	0.103	0.454	0.316	0.155	-0.161	0.153	ATL	TE	0.129	31.9%	53.1%	5.3%
GB	TE	0.188	0.203	0.259	0.234	0.390	0.418		0.028	0.183	GB	TE	0.141	30.3%	48.3%	3.3%
CLE	TE	0.192	0.329	0.097	0.331	0.429	0.458	0.222	-0.236	0.132	CLE	TE	0.137	30.3%	48.1%	3.5%
ARI	TE	0.274	0.232	0.211	0.142	0.051	0.272	0.137	-0.135	-0.062	ARI	TE	0.147	30.0%	47.3%	6.4%
BUF	TE	0.283	0.297	0.112	0.317	0.089	0.182	0.262	0.081	-0.075	BUF	TE	0.091	27.4%	39.3%	5.5%
JAX	TE	0.237	0.228	0.184	0.242	0.550	0.236	0.066	-0.170	0.061	JAX	TE	0.124	27.2%	38.9%	4.0%
TB	TE	0.156	0.164	0.405	0.256		0.212	0.546	0.334	0.134	TB	TE	0.109	27.2%	38.7%	0.1%
DEN	TE	0.171	0.333	0.235	0.330	0.225	0.403	0.032	-0.370	-0.047	DEN	TE	0.115	27.1%	38.4%	1.2%
CAR	TE	0.131	0.099	0.147		0.169	0.366	0.202	-0.164	0.120	CAR	TE	0.139	27.0%	38.0%	7.2%
TEN	TE	0.406	0.066	0.122			0.134	0.141	0.008	-0.060	TEN	TE	0.087	25.0%	32.1%	1.9%
NO	TE	0.180	0.184	0.228	0.192	0.180		0.269	0.088	0.029	NO	TE	0.103	24.4%	30.2%	3.2%
MIA	TE	0.066	0.070	0.186	0.086	0.170	0.202	0.228	0.025	0.098	MIA	TE	0.101	24.3%	29.8%	3.0%
NYJ	TE	0.121	0.190	0.172	0.225	0.138	0.108	0.359	0.251	0.025	NYJ	TE	0.082	23.7%	28.2%	-0.6%
DAL	TE	0.170	0.072	0.293	0.198	0.222	0.103	0.275	0.172	0.016	DAL	TE	0.078	23.3%	26.8%	3.4%
MIN	TE	0.128	0.281	0.289	0.217	0.183	0.117	0.124	0.007	-0.087	MIN	TE	0.103	23.1%	26.3%	-3.5%
PIT	TE	0.130	0.311	0.231	0.248	0.172	0.487		0.315	0.099	PIT	TE	0.113	22.6%	24.7%	-0.7%
HOU	TE	0.312	0.101	0.286	0.114	0.365	0.222		-0.222	0.090	HOU	TE	0.093	22.3%	23.7%	-3.3%
BAL	TE	0.369	0.288	0.165	0.341	0.303	0.240	0.189	-0.051	-0.047	BAL	TE	0.086	21.8%	22.4%	-2.2%
LAC	TE	0.145	0.121	0.233	0.217	0.087	0.063	0.162	0.099	-0.075	LAC	TE	0.079	20.0%	16.8%	-0.2%
CIN	TE	0.184	0.314	0.422	0.198	0.098	0.279	0.114	-0.165	-0.116	CIN	TE	0.095	19.3%	14.6%	-2.6%
NYG	TE	0.197	0.280	0.113	0.205	0.122	0.109	0.216	0.107	-0.049	NYG	TE	0.104	18.7%	12.9%	-2.2%
LAR	TE		0.117	0.117	0.073	0.237	0.114	0.091	-0.022	0.045	LAR	TE	0.068	17.5%	9.3%	-5.8%
DET	TE	0.112	0.066	0.076	0.171			0.149	0.149	0.042	DET	TE	0.057	14.3%	0.0%	-9.4%

---

Tops TEs teams are KC, PHI, IND, OAK, NE, CHI, and SF. These teams use the TEs for targeting and points the way for trades etc.

Caution in using TEs from DET, LAR, NYJ, LAC, DAL, BUF and BAL. 

---

No grouping but a steep decline in the first 6 teams.KC on down. The teams after the 6th decline slower and seem closer to together. 

---

Wide Receivers

TEAMs	POS	Week 1	Week 2	Week 3	Week 4	Week 5	Week 6	Week 7	DIFF	First 4 vs Last 3	TEAMs	POS	Avg TPM	% Usage	POS Rankings	Pos Balance in Team
MIN	WR	0.706	0.927	1.402	1.117	0.763	0.701	0.963	0.263	-0.229	MIN	WR	0.253	56.8%	100.0%	27.7%
DET	WR	1.414	1.019	0.586	0.616	0.750		0.386	-0.364	-0.340	DET	WR	0.227	56.7%	100.0%	31.5%
HOU	WR	0.694	0.776	0.980	0.937	0.699	0.519	0.642	0.124	-0.227	HOU	WR	0.228	54.4%	90.4%	28.8%
TB	WR	0.684	0.986	1.046	0.832		0.952	0.910	-0.043	0.044	TB	WR	0.216	54.2%	89.4%	25.9%
LAR	WR	0.913	0.703	0.730	0.881	0.678	0.540	0.457	-0.084	-0.248	LAR	WR	0.204	52.5%	82.6%	22.9%
GB	WR	0.976	0.563	0.776	0.818	0.810	0.771		-0.039	0.007	GB	WR	0.236	50.7%	75.3%	26.0%
DEN	WR	0.740	0.850	0.538	0.825	0.965	0.725	0.519	-0.206	-0.002	DEN	WR	0.215	50.5%	74.5%	24.1%
BAL	WR	0.482	0.812	0.794	0.681	1.180	0.665	0.944	0.279	0.237	BAL	WR	0.199	50.3%	73.7%	22.1%
CLE	WR	0.552	0.659	0.907	0.794	0.791	0.951	0.777	-0.174	0.112	CLE	WR	0.226	49.9%	72.0%	19.8%
NYJ	WR	0.423	0.823	0.721	0.855	0.588	0.594	0.755	0.161	-0.060	NYJ	WR	0.170	49.2%	68.9%	23.4%
ATL	WR	0.898	0.572	0.750	0.992	0.778	0.853	0.774	-0.079	-0.001	ATL	WR	0.194	48.1%	64.4%	22.8%
PIT	WR	0.782	1.336	0.824	1.362	0.618	0.515		-0.103	-0.509	PIT	WR	0.236	47.4%	61.6%	23.2%
CIN	WR	0.551	0.691	0.958	0.893	0.654	1.077	0.875	-0.202	0.095	CIN	WR	0.228	46.4%	57.6%	24.3%
TEN	WR	0.541	0.560	0.397	0.992	0.611	0.357	0.537	0.180	-0.121	TEN	WR	0.154	44.3%	48.8%	18.2%
NYG	WR	0.722	0.528	0.535	0.821	1.181	0.836	0.722	-0.115	0.262	NYG	WR	0.243	43.9%	47.5%	20.3%
IND	WR	0.732	0.600	1.017	1.527	0.894	1.089	0.240	-0.848	-0.228	IND	WR	0.235	42.8%	42.7%	18.4%
JAX	WR	0.508	0.845	0.625	0.591	1.246	0.661	0.953	0.292	0.311	JAX	WR	0.194	42.5%	41.4%	22.8%
SEA	WR	0.603	0.625	0.458	0.576	0.361	0.541		0.180	-0.115	SEA	WR	0.132	40.8%	34.5%	19.0%
ARI	WR	0.549	0.387	0.592	0.567	0.657	0.738	0.891	0.153	0.238	ARI	WR	0.199	40.8%	34.5%	20.5%
LAC	WR	0.784	0.394	0.661	0.589	0.462	0.443	0.528	0.085	-0.129	LAC	WR	0.161	40.6%	33.8%	17.1%
MIA	WR	0.723	0.563	0.745	0.732	0.544	0.877	0.569	-0.308	-0.027	MIA	WR	0.164	39.4%	29.0%	19.6%
NO	WR	0.898	0.673	0.620	0.384	0.451		0.448	-0.003	-0.195	NO	WR	0.165	39.3%	28.3%	13.7%
BUF	WR	0.808	0.483	0.364	0.713	0.355	0.515	0.450	-0.065	-0.152	BUF	WR	0.127	38.4%	24.7%	12.0%
CHI	WR	0.450	0.727	0.633	0.425		0.494	0.730	0.235	0.053	CHI	WR	0.157	36.6%	17.5%	13.0%
DAL	WR	0.646	0.540	0.660	0.529	0.591	0.515	0.688	0.173	0.004	DAL	WR	0.123	36.4%	16.4%	16.8%
KC	WR	0.626	0.575	0.566	0.681	0.642	0.713	0.593	-0.120	0.037	KC	WR	0.163	36.1%	15.5%	11.0%
PHI	WR	0.342	0.561	0.174	0.827	0.514	0.646	0.482	-0.164	0.072	PHI	WR	0.169	34.8%	10.1%	13.2%
WAS	WR	0.341	0.540	0.309		0.823	0.508	0.388	-0.120	0.177	WAS	WR	0.132	33.8%	5.9%	22.5%
SF	WR	0.659	0.237	0.467	0.661	0.796	0.485	0.368	-0.117	0.044	SF	WR	0.131	33.4%	4.2%	16.0%
OAK	WR	0.286	0.638	0.519	1.026	0.592	0.490		-0.102	-0.076	OAK	WR	0.148	33.3%	3.8%	15.3%
NE	WR	0.449	0.582	0.482	0.414	0.798	0.581	0.771	0.190	0.235	NE	WR	0.151	32.9%	2.1%	9.8%
CAR	WR	0.392	0.825	0.472		0.592	0.854	1.052	0.198	0.270	CAR	WR	0.167	32.4%	0.2%	12.1%

---

The best WRs are those used a lot and fast in targeting. These WRs can be found in MIN, DET, IND, NYG, PIT, GB, CLE, HOU, CIN, LAR, and DEN. These are key teams in PPR leagues for WRs. 

The teams with the least used WRs are DAL, BUF, SEA, WAS, SF and NE. Some surprising teams on this list. Caution. 

---

MIN and DET are clear leaders. Hou and TB are also grouped together. Clearly 4 teams of extreme interest in WRs. Note HOU Coutee out! So his replacement has juice.

---

 

Related Posts

• 
  DraftKings PGA Wyndham Championship Preview
• 
  NFL 2020 Top 30 IDP Defensive Tackles
• 
  Red Zone Team Tendencies Part 1

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.