By John Bush

Team Snaps Per Minute Week 7

Team Snaps Per Minute Week 7 Report is a data “Snapshot” of the post Week 8 team snaps per minute activities and speed of play.

The Avg Team Snaps/Minute give insight into the team’s speed. A highly involved pass catcher player on a fast team is worth knowing! Also looking at slow teams can give the insight to run heavy teams.

Snaps Per Minute Week 7 2018 report covers players like running backs, wide receivers and tight ends in a team’s lineup.

A majority of snaps are going to what players and which ones are in line to produce statistically weekly in fantasy football?

The TEAM and PLAYER Snaps per Minute of Possession report will help you: identify the early TEAM and PLAYER Level leaders for such production.

• Identify the leaders for such production.
• Identify Weekly Change at the Team, Positional and Player Levels
• The Snap Report can be a positive indicator because it’s easier for players to score more when given the opportunity.
• Conversely, the weekly ‘Snap Report’ can identify when players fall out of favor or when game flow or player movement occurs due to injuries.
• It’s useful to compare the weekly snap leaders to rushing attempt leaders and target leaders to get a feel for how a player is used for fantasy football purposes. See other reports. 

---

TEAM Level Database Week 1 to 7 Snaps Per Minute

Use the sortable database to focus on successful teams (Points Per Snap). What Teams have improved? (DIFF). The pattern of Weekly Speeds. Successful Teams vs their Speed. 

This database includes:

TEAM: All Teams

Weeks: Week 1 to 6 Team Snaps Per Minute Average

Snaps Per Minute Average: Average of Team Snap_Min

Scaled Team Speed: Scaled Team Speed

Changes in Speed Within Teams: Last 2 Games DIFF

Team Points Scored Last 3 Games Average: Team Points /Game

Team: All Teams

Points Scored vs Snap Average by Team

(Team Speed of Success): Points/Snaps

---

TEAM	Week 1	Week 2	Week 3	Week 4	Week 5	Week 6	Week 7	TEAM	AVG SPM	Scaled SPM	DIFF	AVG Points Per Last 3 GAME	TEAM	Speed of Success
ARI	2.424	1.740	2.114	2.125	2.576	2.252	2.262	ARI	2.220	-0.020	0.009	18.3	ARI	7.744
ATL	2.515	2.121	2.318	2.395	2.333	2.117	2.013	ATL	2.263	0.023	-0.103	24.7	ATL	11.465
BAL	2.271	2.227	2.381	2.185	2.933	1.996	2.568	BAL	2.369	0.129	0.571	17.7	BAL	7.083
BUF	2.584	2.303	1.874	2.299	1.922	1.879	2.099	BUF	2.144	-0.096	0.220	10.3	BUF	5.238
CAR	2.190	2.211	1.975		2.003	2.439	2.387	CAR	2.207	-0.033	-0.052	23.7	CAR	10.412
CHI	2.098	1.919	2.036	2.161		2.306	2.720	CHI	2.202	-0.038	0.413	35.7	CHI	14.206
CIN	2.022	2.387	2.492	2.415	1.962	2.434	2.245	CIN	2.278	0.038	-0.189	19.3	CIN	8.720
CLE	2.137	2.270	2.495	2.712	2.637	2.607	2.517	CLE	2.483	0.243	-0.090	16.3	CLE	6.300
DAL	2.177	1.906	2.237	2.282	2.289	1.880	2.269	DAL	2.146	-0.094	0.390	24.3	DAL	11.323
DEN	2.106	2.438	2.284	2.476	2.476	2.658	1.915	DEN	2.338	0.098	-0.743	27	DEN	11.492
DET	2.604	2.530	1.885	1.847	2.325		1.902	DET	2.192	-0.048	-0.423	29	DET	13.722
GB	2.253	1.734	2.232	2.220	2.430	2.281		GB	2.203	-0.037	-0.149	26	GB	11.039
HOU	2.566	2.261	2.776	2.441	2.430	2.259	2.163	HOU	2.422	0.182	-0.096	19.7	HOU	8.624
IND	2.500	2.288	3.000	3.714	2.559	3.004	1.981	IND	2.717	0.477	-1.023	31.7	IND	12.605
JAX	2.134	2.308	2.094	2.068	3.042	2.268	2.236	JAX	2.305	0.065	-0.032	9.3	JAX	3.698
KC	2.190	2.085	2.532	2.214	2.140	2.264	2.076	KC	2.217	-0.023	-0.188	38.3	KC	17.732
LAC	2.381	1.726	2.021	2.110	1.846	1.898	1.787	LAC	1.956	-0.284	-0.110	28	LAC	15.186
LAR	2.212	2.109	2.247	2.020	2.237	2.104	1.857	LAR	2.105	-0.135	-0.247	31.7	LAR	15.342
MIA	2.038	2.111	2.048	2.109	2.176	2.631	2.125	MIA	2.180	-0.060	-0.505	23	MIA	9.954
MIN	2.279	2.051	2.722	2.296	1.891	2.073	2.144	MIN	2.196	-0.044	0.071	29	MIN	14.243
NE	2.406	2.087	2.313	2.236	2.503	2.158	2.144	NE	2.264	0.024	-0.014	39.7	NE	17.502
NO	2.298	2.019	2.576	2.241	1.983		2.118	NO	2.212	-0.028	0.135	33.3	NO	16.239
NYG	2.329	2.112	1.746	2.121	2.281	2.364	2.309	NYG	2.167	-0.073	-0.055	21.3	NYG	9.189
NYJ	1.812	2.058	2.162	2.474	2.145	1.917	2.552	NYJ	2.156	-0.084	0.635	31	NYJ	14.059
OAK	2.348	1.974	1.973	3.147	2.053	2.100		OAK	2.266	0.026	0.048	19.3	OAK	9.295
PHI	2.238	2.216	2.033	2.580	2.168	2.185	1.899	PHI	2.191	-0.049	-0.286	24	PHI	11.518
PIT	2.190	2.548	2.175	2.600	2.094	2.090		PIT	2.274	0.034	-0.004	27.7	PIT	13.242
SEA	2.292	2.578	2.108	2.113	1.967	2.036		SEA	2.191	-0.049	0.069	19.3	SEA	9.642
SF	2.288	2.165	2.268	2.203	2.438	1.975	2.136	SF	2.217	-0.023	0.162	26	SF	11.911
TB	2.053	2.382	2.496	2.017		2.328	2.880	TB	2.355	0.115	0.552	21.7	TB	8.333
TEN	2.332	1.944	1.891	2.429	2.062	1.961	2.007	TEN	2.088	-0.152	0.045	10.3	TEN	5.124
WAS	2.072	2.220	2.097		2.283	1.977	1.941	WAS	2.101	-0.139	-0.037	20.7	WAS	10.014

 

 

---

Combination Graph of Team Average Snaps Per Minute vs Points Per Last 3 Game (Speed vs Success)

The Blue Star Teams are very successful teams using avg points last 3 games.

The red teams are less successful as measured by points average in the last 3 games. 

FAST

IND is by far the fastest team and they are producing  30 ish points a game. CLE, HOU, and BAL have speed but low success. Next, we see strong successful teams that are fast. They are DEN, NE, NO, and KC (Popular Teams)! These fast success team will tend to have a depth on fantasy relevant players. Trade, Drop/Add, and Waiver Wires.

SLOW

There are interesting teams that are slow in speed but very efficient in scoring points.  LAR and NYJ are very slow teams but are producing 27 plus points per game.  The opposing teams are like TEN and BUF; Slow and Low Success!

It’s necessary to “know” what all the league teams are. Yes, you need to memorize this information.

---

Improving Declining Teams: DIFF Metric vs Speed

The DIFF metric focuses on teams that improved or declined in speed. You should consider the reasons why. A new trend? Player off injury or injured?

NYJ, BAL, TB, CHI, DAL, BUF, SF, and NO. All of these teams improved. Note BAL and TB were very fast teams that moved even faster last week!

IND, DEN, MIA, DET, PHI, LAR and CIN all declined in speed? Why? Is this a problem?

---

Team Points Per Game, Total Snaps and Points Per Snap.

These metrics remove the speed component and just focus us onto the success per snap concept. The top teams will not be surprises. These metrics will move likely be the season level for all teams involved. Obviously, we watch for new trends to change our minds.

KC, NE, NO, LAR, LAC, MIN, and CHI are the top 7 teams in success per snaps. They will be the teams with move relevant players as a whole.

The poor successful teams are JAX, TEN, BUF, CLE, BAL, ARI and TB.  Only a few players will be worth holding in your fantasy player portfolios! Trade away from these teams toward the top teams on average.

Note the top teams are below the average in SPM! IND is an exception! Its seems the DAL and WAS should have more success than they have had using this metric for prediction! 

——————————————————————–

TEAM vs Positional Speed in Snaps per Minute For the Season

This sortable table includes:

NUM: Number Sorted Team and Position

Team: All teams

Position: Team Pos

DIFFs in Positional Usage: DIFF

Avg Positional Snaps/Min: Weeks 1 to 7

% of Team Usage in Snaps/Min: Team Usage

Team: All teams

Position: Team Pos

Usage % convert to a Ranking from High to Low: Usage Ranking

Usages Scaled to the League Positional Averages: Scaled to AVG

NUM	Team	Pos	Week 1	Week 2	Week 3	Week 4	Week 5	Week 6	Week 7	DIFF	Average of Player Snaps-MIN	% USAGE	Team	Pos	Usage Ranking	Scaled to Avg Rankings
1	ARI	RB	0.884	0.619	0.789	0.779	1.010	0.828	0.811	-0.018	0.817	0.251	ARI	RB	38.824	-7.376
2	ARI	TE	1.326	1.179	0.846	1.004	1.263	1.049	0.925	-0.123	1.067	0.327	ARI	TE	45.707	-0.993
3	ARI	WR	1.692	1.102	1.416	1.319	1.212	1.408	1.525	0.117	1.376	0.422	ARI	WR	44.183	7.983
4	ATL	RB	1.018	0.797	0.818	0.935	0.648	0.864	0.805	-0.058	0.832	0.294	ATL	RB	68.172	21.972
5	ATL	TE	1.090	1.010	0.955	1.026	0.886	1.106	0.940	-0.166	1.002	0.354	ATL	TE	59.831	13.131
6	ATL	WR	1.042	1.037	1.045	1.015	1.064	0.779	0.966	0.187	0.992	0.351	ATL	WR	-0.193	-36.393
7	BAL	RB	0.747	1.100	1.224	0.700	0.921	0.674	0.818	0.144	0.854	0.270	BAL	RB	51.977	5.777
8	BAL	TE	1.135	0.934	1.125	1.164	1.011	0.665	0.906	0.241	0.975	0.309	BAL	TE	36.039	-10.661
9	BAL	WR	1.033	1.461	1.397	0.954	1.862	1.158	1.624	0.466	1.331	0.421	BAL	WR	43.602	7.402
10	BUF	RB	0.656	0.650	0.765	0.624	0.569	0.758	0.590	-0.167	0.651	0.241	BUF	RB	32.059	-14.141
11	BUF	TE	1.023	0.966	0.914	0.911	0.927	0.788	0.812	0.024	0.906	0.335	BUF	TE	49.624	2.924
12	BUF	WR	1.437	1.449	0.839	1.252	0.863	0.915	1.396	0.481	1.149	0.425	BUF	WR	45.756	9.556
13	CAR	RB	0.969	0.803	0.855		0.818	0.854	0.877	0.023	0.863	0.271	CAR	RB	52.366	6.166
14	CAR	TE	0.948	1.254	1.342		1.213	0.949	1.315	0.366	1.138	0.357	CAR	TE	61.345	14.645
15	CAR	WR	1.275	1.535	1.143		0.851	1.358	1.106	-0.252	1.184	0.372	CAR	WR	12.699	-23.501
16	CHI	RB	0.869	1.003	0.571	0.646		0.824	1.459	0.636	0.826	0.294	CHI	RB	68.197	21.997
17	CHI	TE	0.829	0.683	0.880	0.806		0.988	1.095	0.106	0.867	0.309	CHI	TE	36.208	-10.492
18	CHI	WR	1.079	0.971	1.045	0.985		1.173	1.426	0.253	1.113	0.397	CHI	WR	28.294	-7.906
19	CIN	RB	0.723	0.838	1.227	1.191	0.965	1.217	1.122	-0.094	1.008	0.313	CIN	RB	80.391	34.191
20	CIN	TE	0.919	1.257	1.252	0.992	0.992	1.257	0.812	-0.445	1.059	0.329	CIN	TE	46.419	-0.281
21	CIN	WR	1.022	1.398	1.003	1.108	0.981	1.380	1.294	-0.087	1.157	0.359	CIN	WR	4.615	-31.585
22	CLE	RB	0.736	0.757	0.853	0.904	0.879	0.869	1.481	0.612	0.898	0.266	CLE	RB	48.872	2.672
23	CLE	TE	0.780	1.086	1.220	1.488	0.882	0.749	1.110	0.362	1.015	0.300	CLE	TE	31.789	-14.911
24	CLE	WR	1.056	1.891	1.238	1.257	1.385	2.466	1.564	-0.902	1.467	0.434	CLE	WR	51.623	15.423
25	DAL	RB	0.782	0.743	0.782	0.794	0.825	0.678	1.152	0.474	0.806	0.297	DAL	RB	70.061	23.861
26	DAL	TE	0.930	0.827	0.905	1.114	1.034	0.876	0.705	-0.171	0.903	0.333	DAL	TE	48.797	2.097
27	DAL	WR	0.958	0.797	1.021	1.131	0.978	0.942	1.238	0.295	1.002	0.370	DAL	WR	11.365	-24.835
28	DEN	RB	0.619	0.711	0.663	0.794	0.732	0.846	0.641	-0.205	0.715	0.248	DEN	RB	37.102	-9.098
29	DEN	TE	0.920	0.850	0.862	1.403	0.825	1.168	0.768	-0.400	0.949	0.329	DEN	TE	46.820	0.120
30	DEN	WR	1.047	1.352	1.236	1.279	1.395	1.281	0.935	-0.346	1.218	0.423	DEN	WR	44.444	8.244
31	DET	RB	0.868	0.715	0.535	0.539	0.722		0.594	-0.128	0.653	0.228	DET	RB	23.853	-22.347
32	DET	TE	0.614	0.756	0.705	0.559	1.238		0.802	-0.435	0.744	0.260	DET	TE	11.010	-35.690
33	DET	WR	1.547	1.881	1.274	1.334	1.538		1.181	-0.356	1.463	0.511	DET	WR	100.000	63.800
34	GB	RB	1.126	0.822	0.722	0.750	0.840	0.771		-0.069	0.822	0.260	GB	RB	45.185	-1.015
35	GB	TE	1.064	0.743	0.873	1.032	0.743	0.819		0.077	0.869	0.275	GB	TE	18.790	-27.910
36	GB	WR	1.455	1.199	1.593	1.439	1.665	1.453		-0.212	1.467	0.465	GB	WR	70.746	34.546
37	HOU	RB	0.855	1.147	1.388	1.220	1.246	1.222	1.059	-0.163	1.137	0.284	HOU	RB	61.036	14.836
38	HOU	TE	1.318	1.024	1.252	1.164	1.053	0.988	1.437	0.449	1.163	0.290	HOU	TE	26.634	-20.066
39	HOU	WR	1.569	1.969	1.837	1.568	2.167	1.472	1.487	0.015	1.706	0.426	HOU	WR	46.517	10.317
40	IND	RB	0.874	0.769	1.288	1.124	0.763	0.860	0.713	-0.147	0.900	0.240	IND	RB	31.974	-14.226
41	IND	TE	1.209	1.425	1.525	1.816	1.125	1.205	0.710	-0.494	1.244	0.332	IND	TE	48.439	1.739
42	IND	WR	1.540	1.103	1.597	2.055	1.781	1.970	1.156	-0.815	1.599	0.427	IND	WR	47.266	11.066
43	JAX	RB	0.661	0.666	0.588	0.544	0.852	0.819	0.616	-0.202	0.673	0.220	JAX	RB	18.162	-28.038
44	JAX	TE	1.107	0.888	0.857	0.877	1.148	0.756	0.871	0.115	0.932	0.305	JAX	TE	34.048	-12.652
45	JAX	WR	0.928	1.552	1.387	1.383	2.089	1.654	1.348	-0.306	1.455	0.475	JAX	WR	77.496	41.296
46	KC	RB	0.694	0.611	0.675	0.539	0.512	0.545	0.601	0.056	0.597	0.193	KC	RB	0.402	-45.798
47	KC	TE	1.291	0.899	1.616	1.476	1.452	1.405	1.409	0.004	1.333	0.432	KC	TE	100.000	53.300
48	KC	WR	1.080	1.064	1.122	1.186	0.953	1.583	1.253	-0.330	1.155	0.375	KC	WR	14.439	-21.761
49	LAC	RB	0.881	0.530	0.855	0.858	0.788	0.601	0.677	0.076	0.726	0.271	LAC	RB	52.418	6.218
50	LAC	TE	0.910	0.706	0.972	0.889	0.846	0.928	0.758	-0.169	0.858	0.320	LAC	TE	42.137	-4.563
51	LAC	WR	1.634	0.878	1.146	1.061	1.075	1.075	0.910	-0.165	1.096	0.409	LAC	WR	35.833	-0.367
52	LAR	RB	1.106	1.055	1.124	1.010	2.237	1.052	0.928	-0.124	1.137	0.342	LAR	RB	100.000	53.800
53	LAR	TE	0.784	1.055	0.788	0.722	0.802	0.739	0.761	0.022	0.795	0.239	LAR	TE	-0.007	-46.707
54	LAR	WR	1.624	1.582	1.656	1.478	1.308	1.240	1.029	-0.211	1.395	0.419	LAR	WR	42.384	6.184
55	MIA	RB	1.052	1.056	1.047	0.689	0.782	1.332	0.810	-0.523	0.930	0.291	MIA	RB	65.708	19.508
56	MIA	TE	0.899	0.891	0.776	0.925	0.629	0.944	0.746	-0.198	0.836	0.261	MIA	TE	11.518	-35.182
57	MIA	WR	1.340	1.416	1.145	1.582	1.581	1.531	1.490	-0.042	1.434	0.448	MIA	WR	60.410	24.210
58	MIN	RB	0.899	0.749	0.935	0.540	0.526	0.584	0.552	-0.032	0.657	0.223	MIN	RB	20.560	-25.640
59	MIN	TE	1.049	0.871	1.505	0.951	0.824	0.954	0.870	-0.084	0.978	0.333	MIN	TE	48.458	1.758
60	MIN	WR	1.388	1.079	1.948	1.185	1.205	1.285	1.175	-0.110	1.306	0.444	MIN	WR	57.871	21.671
61	NE	RB	0.963	0.701	0.759	0.800	1.028	0.747	0.695	-0.052	0.805	0.252	NE	RB	39.697	-6.503
62	NE	TE	1.572	0.969	1.566	1.366	0.955	0.839	1.843	1.003	1.196	0.374	NE	TE	70.118	23.418
63	NE	WR	1.251	1.574	1.799	1.043	1.094	0.881	1.206	0.325	1.194	0.374	NE	WR	13.909	-22.291
64	NO	RB	0.655	0.673	0.750	0.672	0.821		0.875	0.054	0.731	0.239	NO	RB	31.251	-14.949
65	NO	TE	1.346	1.423	1.533	1.281	0.881		0.895	0.014	1.178	0.386	NO	TE	75.946	29.246
66	NO	WR	1.228	1.086	1.304	1.050	1.044		1.126	0.082	1.146	0.375	NO	WR	14.741	-21.459
67	NYG	RB	0.623	0.559	0.479	0.775	1.141	0.848	0.842	-0.007	0.710	0.214	NYG	RB	14.098	-32.102
68	NYG	TE	1.061	0.901	0.779	1.163	1.487	2.291	1.143	-1.148	1.132	0.341	NYG	TE	52.863	6.163
69	NYG	WR	1.468	1.405	1.120	1.454	1.527	1.600	1.864	0.264	1.477	0.445	NYG	WR	58.573	22.373
70	NYJ	RB	0.604	1.029	1.081	1.237	0.692	0.576	0.839	0.263	0.824	0.284	NYJ	RB	61.517	15.317
71	NYJ	TE	0.891	0.960	0.881	1.124	1.338	0.763	0.935	0.172	0.969	0.335	NYJ	TE	49.642	2.942
72	NYJ	WR	0.737	1.338	1.195	1.304	0.927	0.961	1.301	0.340	1.102	0.381	NYJ	WR	18.301	-17.899
73	OAK	RB	0.643	0.569	0.610	0.881	0.592	0.586		-0.006	0.647	0.222	OAK	RB	19.799	-26.401
74	OAK	TE	1.068	0.850	0.857	1.403	0.816	0.863		0.048	0.976	0.336	OAK	TE	50.010	3.310
75	OAK	WR	1.988	0.990	0.961	1.601	1.362	1.113		-0.249	1.286	0.442	OAK	WR	56.707	20.507
76	PHI	RB	0.560	0.739	0.678	0.860	0.723	1.077	0.642	-0.435	0.729	0.250	PHI	RB	38.124	-8.076
77	PHI	TE	0.943	1.094	1.380	1.268	1.139	1.169	1.030	-0.139	1.146	0.392	PHI	TE	79.422	32.722
78	PHI	WR	1.200	1.094	0.986	1.297	1.014	0.867	0.890	0.023	1.046	0.358	PHI	WR	4.145	-32.055
79	PIT	RB	1.252	0.829	0.791	1.052	0.575	0.849		0.274	0.842	0.281	PIT	RB	58.881	12.681
80	PIT	TE	1.186	0.932	0.890	0.963	0.950	1.174		0.224	1.006	0.335	PIT	TE	49.813	3.113
81	PIT	WR	0.943	1.473	1.107	1.593	1.016	0.830		-0.186	1.153	0.384	PIT	WR	20.550	-15.650
82	SEA	RB	0.633	0.563	0.588	0.560	0.721	0.549		-0.173	0.596	0.201	SEA	RB	5.486	-40.714
83	SEA	TE	1.367	1.426	1.130	0.993	1.148	0.938		-0.209	1.167	0.394	SEA	TE	80.161	33.461
84	SEA	WR	1.231	1.445	1.185	1.242	0.997	1.107		0.110	1.201	0.405	SEA	WR	33.647	-2.553
85	SF	RB	0.789	1.094	0.901	0.826	0.858	0.779	0.746	-0.034	0.847	0.281	SF	RB	58.969	12.769
86	SF	TE	0.867	0.970	1.217	1.230	0.970	1.212	1.326	0.113	1.082	0.358	SF	TE	61.867	15.167
87	SF	WR	1.130	0.927	1.061	1.294	1.169	1.083	1.002	-0.081	1.089	0.361	SF	WR	5.920	-30.280
88	TB	RB	0.674	0.780	0.821	0.662		0.741	0.950	0.209	0.771	0.273	TB	RB	53.780	7.580
89	TB	TE	0.715	0.903	0.843	0.592		0.714	0.993	0.279	0.794	0.281	TB	TE	21.725	-24.975
90	TB	WR	1.076	1.191	1.329	1.146		1.305	1.516	0.211	1.261	0.446	TB	WR	59.199	22.999
91	TEN	RB	1.166	0.972	0.946	1.300	1.050	0.981	0.678	-0.302	0.991	0.328	TEN	RB	90.868	44.668
92	TEN	TE	1.172	1.120	1.037	1.106	1.031	0.724	0.763	0.039	0.972	0.322	TEN	TE	42.939	-3.761
93	TEN	WR	1.163	0.883	0.891	1.245	1.024	1.237	0.989	-0.248	1.056	0.350	TEN	WR	-0.942	-37.142
94	WAS	RB	0.726	0.760	0.722		0.761	0.669	0.636	-0.032	0.712	0.251	WAS	RB	38.839	-7.361
95	WAS	TE	1.066	0.790	1.158		0.948	0.979	0.938	-0.041	0.980	0.345	WAS	TE	54.892	8.192
96	WAS	WR	1.233	1.290	0.956		1.228	0.977	1.245	0.268	1.149	0.404	WAS	WR	33.084	-3.116

I would focus on those teams in the extremes of use highs vs lows. Move toward the highly used vs away from lowly used positions by teams! 

---

These colorized graphs show the top to bottom of the position. Note the usage rankings and scaled to average to determine the teams where the position is highly involved! 

Running Backs

LAR, TEN and CIN are the top 3 teams using their RBs. It’s clear if Henry or Lewis were out the other would be a strong producer! 

I use this metric to find the teams where injury would benefit the remaining RBs the most. These would be the top half of the league teams!  

---

Tight Ends

KC stills alone in extreme TE usages! SEA, PHI, NO, NE and SF are also Top TE user teams.  Ben Watson NO is strong than you may think!  

---

Wide Receivers

DET is an extreme WR using team! JAX GB, MIA (Wilson, Stills out makes others much stronger plays! find them), TB, NYG, and MIN are in the Top groups.

The bottom group is TEN, ATL, PHI, CIN, SF, DAL and NE. Poor WR usages. These teams are going to other positions! 

 

——————————————————————–

Look for the companion article Player Snaps Report Week 7.