By John Bush

Team Targets Per Minute Week 6

Team Targets Per Minute Week 6 report looks at the use of weekly target numbers by position, player, and by the team. This metric is useful in fantasy football especially in PPR scoring formats where receptions count.  The tables/graphs below provide target data for the running back, wide receiver, and tight end positions.

Green/Blue colorization of the weekly targets and targets per minute numbers highlights players at the top of the position group, i.e., many targets per minute, while red colorization of the weekly target numbers denotes players toward the bottom of the position group, i.e., fewer targets per minute of play.

Compare and contrast the data and envision this week’s game scripts by using all your resources including this one.

See my snaps reports click link

player-snaps-per…nute-week-6-2018

team-snaps-per-minute-week-6

—————————————————————————

Targets Weeks 1 to 6 with Weekly, Total Targets, and DIFFs

Many players only look at raw target player metrics and that is it. These data expand that vision via team level. Players are a product of the Team and should have that as a component of your analysis. 

Below I have a sortable table** that lists the following:

• NUM
• TEAMs
• POS
• Team Targets in Weeks 1 to 6
• Total Targets for Team
• DIFF Targets differences in the last two games

** Note the NUM column is presorted by Team Position and Total Targets. 

NUM	TEAMs	POS	Week 1	Week 2	Week 3	Week 4	Week 5	Week 6	Total Targets	DIFF
1	ARI	RB	13	7	5	5	4	5	39	1
2	ARI	TE	6	6	5	4	1	7	29	6
3	ARI	WR	12	10	14	16	13	19	84	6
4	ATL	RB	7	5	7	6	6	4	35	-2
5	ATL	TE	4	6	5	3	14	10	42	-4
6	ATL	WR	25	17	22	29	24	27	144	3
7	BAL	RB	7	11	8	4	13	3	46	-10
8	BAL	TE	13	11	5	12	9	9	59	0
9	BAL	WR	17	31	24	24	35	25	156	-10
10	BUF	RB	5	12	5	7	4	6	39	2
11	BUF	TE	7	8	4	8	3	6	36	3
12	BUF	WR	20	13	13	18	12	17	93	5
13	CAR	RB	9	17	3		6	8	43	2
14	CAR	TE	4	3	5		6	9	27	3
15	CAR	WR	12	25	16		21	21	95	0
16	CHI	RB	10	5	7	9		10	41	1
17	CHI	TE	9	4	5	4		5	27	1
18	CHI	WR	15	25	23	12		15	90	3
19	CIN	RB	8	8	9	8	7	7	47	0
20	CIN	TE	5	10	11	6	3	7	42	4
21	CIN	WR	15	22	25	27	20	27	136	7
22	CLE	RB	8	3	5	7	5	5	33	0
23	CLE	TE	8	9	3	10	13	13	56	0
24	CLE	WR	23	18	28	24	24	27	144	3
25	DAL	RB	5	6	8	5	7	2	33	-5
26	DAL	TE	5	2	8	6	6	4	31	-2
27	DAL	WR	19	15	18	16	16	20	104	4
28	DEN	RB	5	3	10	5	14	10	47	-4
29	DEN	TE	6	9	7	8	7	10	47	3
30	DEN	WR	26	23	16	20	30	18	133	-12
31	DET	RB	10	19	9	6	5		49	-1
32	DET	TE	3	2	3	5			13	-5
33	DET	WR	38	31	23	18	20		130	2
34	GB	RB	5	6	11	4	10	7	43	-3
35	GB	TE	5	9	8	8	13	13	56	0
36	GB	WR	26	25	24	28	27	24	154	-3
37	HOU	RB	3	2	7	3	9	6	30	-3
38	HOU	TE	9	3	7	4	12	6	41	-6
39	HOU	WR	20	23	24	33	23	14	137	-9
40	IND	RB	12	6	7	12	11	6	54	-5
41	IND	TE	16	9	12	12	18	11	78	-7
42	IND	WR	24	16	20	37	29	25	151	-4
43	JAX	RB	10	12	11	7	11	7	58	-4
44	JAX	TE	7	7	5	9	15	5	48	-10
45	JAX	WR	15	26	17	22	34	14	128	-20
46	KC	RB	3	2	7	4	4	10	30	6
47	KC	TE	6	10	13	15	10	9	63	-1
48	KC	WR	16	16	17	24	21	17	111	-4
49	LAC	RB	18	10	7	13	7	5	60	-2
50	LAC	TE	5	4	6	7	3	2	27	-1
51	LAC	WR	27	13	17	19	16	14	106	-2
52	LAR	RB	7	4	7	6	5	5	34	0
53	LAR	TE		4	4	2	7	4	21	-3
54	LAR	WR	26	24	25	24	20	19	138	-1
55	MIA	RB	4	5	4	5	11	7	36	-4
56	MIA	TE	2	2	4	2	5	6	21	1
57	MIA	WR	22	16	16	17	16	26	113	10
58	MIN	RB	9	5	14	6	5	3	42	-2
59	MIN	TE	4	10	7	7	6	4	38	-2
60	MIN	WR	22	33	34	36	25	24	174	-1
61	NE	RB	17	11	10	11	15	10	74	-5
62	NE	TE	8	7	5	9	7	4	40	-3
63	NE	WR	14	17	10	15	22	21	99	-1
64	NO	RB	13	7	23	12	7		62	-5
65	NO	TE	5	6	7	6	6		30	0
66	NO	WR	25	22	19	12	15		93	3
67	NYG	RB	8	17	6	11	4	17	63	13
68	NYG	TE	6	9	4	6	3	3	31	0
69	NYG	WR	22	17	19	24	29	23	134	-6
70	NYJ	RB	3	9	4	8	1	3	28	2
71	NYJ	TE	4	6	5	5	4	4	28	0
72	NYJ	WR	14	26	21	19	17	22	119	5
73	OAK	RB	15	6	11	10	9	14	65	5
74	OAK	TE	15	5	6	17	7	2	52	-5
75	OAK	WR	9	21	20	30	15	14	109	-1
76	PHI	RB	7	8	9	9	5	5	43	0
77	PHI	TE	13	19	21	16	13	10	92	-3
78	PHI	WR	11	20	7	25	14	21	98	7
79	PIT	RB	6	7	6	7	4	7	37	3
80	PIT	TE	5	10	7	6	5	17	50	12
81	PIT	WR	30	43	25	33	18	18	167	0
82	SEA	RB	11	7	3	4	4	5	34	1
83	SEA	TE	7	10	8	3	5	1	34	-4
84	SEA	WR	15	16	15	18	11	17	92	6
85	SF	RB	4	10	8	9	14	3	48	-11
86	SF	TE	9	6	8	9	7	6	45	-1
87	SF	WR	19	7	14	18	32	14	104	-18
88	TB	RB	1	5	7	4		7	24	3
89	TB	TE	5	4	12	8		6	35	-2
90	TB	WR	22	24	31	26		27	130	1
91	TEN	RB	9	1	4	11	5	3	33	-2
92	TEN	TE	12	2	4			3	21	3
93	TEN	WR	16	17	13	29	16	8	99	-8
94	WAS	RB	10	17	2		11	4	44	-7
95	WAS	TE	6	9	9		5	12	41	7
96	WAS	WR	13	18	9		22	18	80	-4

---

High vs Lows Total Targets and DIFFs**

Interesting DIFFs are JAX, BAL, IND, SF, DEN, and HOU. These team saw declines in total targets.

Teams with increases were PIT, NYG, CIN, BUF, MIA, NYJ, and ARI. 

** Do note the regression to the average concept here as well. See Graph to compare Targets vs DIFFs

---

Graphical View of Team Total Targets vs DIFF

Top Teams that you want a piece of are: IND, BAL, MIN, PIT, GB, JAX, CLE, and PHI

Bottom Teams are ARI, TEN, CHI, SEA, WAS, CAR, DAL and BUF. 

The Pink Line is the League is DIFFs and it clearly shows the extremes. 

Trade from the bottom to the top teams on average in PPR leagues. 

---

Positional Team Usages vs Scaled Rankings

These next 3 charts focus on RB, TE, and WRs. They also include the % of Usages and a Scaled Ranking from 100 to 0. The scaled rankings highlight the Team’s Positions rankings in Targeting usage vs the League.  

Essential for understanding a trade or waiver wire acquisition. 

Running Backs

---

Tight Ends

---

Wide Receivers

---

Targets Per Minute (TPM) vs Speed of Targeting Within Teams and Positional Targeting Balances in Each Team. 

This Sortable Table includes:

• POS
• TEAMs
• POS Usage
• POS Rankings
• Average of Target_Min (TPM)
• POS Speed of Targeting
• Balance

I have laid out the case for each Team as to their TPM as well as a league average scaled to Positional Usage Ranking as well the Teams Speed of Targeting and the Balance of Targeting Speed to each Position.

POS	TEAMs	POS Usage	POS Rankings	Average of Target_Min	POS Speed of Targeting	Balance
RB	ARI	25.7%	58.7	0.150	30.5%	-2.5%
TE	ARI	19.1%	37.6	0.148	30.1%	-2.9%
WR	ARI	55.3%	44.8	0.194	39.4%	6.4%
RB	ATL	15.8%	14.1	0.085	19.9%	-13.1%
TE	ATL	19.0%	37.4	0.139	32.6%	-0.4%
WR	ATL	65.2%	78.4	0.202	47.5%	14.5%
RB	BAL	17.6%	22.2	0.106	27.4%	-5.6%
TE	BAL	22.6%	48.4	0.090	23.1%	-9.9%
WR	BAL	59.8%	60.1	0.192	49.5%	16.5%
RB	BUF	23.2%	47.6	0.098	31.7%	-1.3%
TE	BUF	21.4%	44.8	0.085	27.8%	-5.2%
WR	BUF	55.4%	45.1	0.125	40.5%	7.5%
RB	CAR	26.1%	60.5	0.205	41.0%	8.0%
TE	CAR	16.4%	29.3	0.130	26.0%	-7.0%
WR	CAR	57.6%	52.6	0.165	32.9%	-0.1%
RB	CHI	25.9%	60.0	0.107	27.7%	-5.3%
TE	CHI	17.1%	31.5	0.119	30.7%	-2.3%
WR	CHI	57.0%	50.5	0.160	41.6%	8.6%
RB	CIN	20.9%	37.0	0.166	33.5%	0.5%
TE	CIN	18.7%	36.3	0.100	20.1%	-12.9%
WR	CIN	60.4%	62.4	0.230	46.3%	13.3%
RB	CLE	14.2%	6.5	0.086	19.2%	-13.8%
TE	CLE	24.0%	52.8	0.131	29.1%	-3.9%
WR	CLE	61.8%	67.0	0.233	51.7%	18.7%
RB	DAL	19.6%	31.4	0.128	39.4%	6.4%
TE	DAL	18.5%	35.7	0.081	25.0%	-8.0%
WR	DAL	61.9%	67.4	0.116	35.6%	2.6%
RB	DEN	20.7%	36.2	0.103	23.1%	-9.9%
TE	DEN	20.7%	42.6	0.121	27.2%	-5.8%
WR	DEN	58.6%	56.1	0.221	49.6%	16.6%
RB	DET	25.5%	58.1	0.124	28.6%	-4.4%
TE	DET	6.8%	0.0	0.053	12.2%	-20.8%
WR	DET	67.7%	87.1	0.258	59.2%	26.2%
RB	GB	17.0%	19.3	0.088	18.9%	-14.1%
TE	GB	22.1%	46.9	0.141	30.3%	-2.7%
WR	GB	60.9%	63.8	0.236	50.7%	17.7%
RB	HOU	14.4%	7.6	0.104	24.3%	-8.7%
TE	HOU	19.7%	39.5	0.093	21.8%	-11.2%
WR	HOU	65.9%	80.8	0.230	53.9%	20.9%
RB	IND	19.1%	28.8	0.136	23.0%	-10.0%
TE	IND	27.6%	63.5	0.212	35.8%	2.8%
WR	IND	53.4%	38.3	0.244	41.2%	8.2%
RB	JAX	24.8%	54.7	0.147	31.2%	-1.8%
TE	JAX	20.5%	42.0	0.129	27.4%	-5.6%
WR	JAX	54.7%	42.9	0.195	41.4%	8.4%
RB	KC	14.7%	8.9	0.067	14.3%	-18.7%
TE	KC	30.9%	73.7	0.237	50.5%	17.5%
WR	KC	54.4%	41.9	0.165	35.2%	2.2%
RB	LAC	31.1%	83.4	0.155	38.7%	5.7%
TE	LAC	14.0%	22.0	0.079	19.7%	-13.3%
WR	LAC	54.9%	43.6	0.167	41.6%	8.6%
RB	LAR	17.6%	22.2	0.122	29.3%	-3.7%
TE	LAR	10.9%	12.5	0.073	17.5%	-15.5%
WR	LAR	71.5%	100.0	0.222	53.2%	20.2%
RB	MIA	21.2%	38.3	0.147	35.6%	2.6%
TE	MIA	12.4%	17.0	0.098	23.7%	-9.3%
WR	MIA	66.5%	82.9	0.167	40.7%	7.7%
RB	MIN	16.5%	17.2	0.096	20.6%	-12.4%
TE	MIN	15.0%	25.0	0.101	21.8%	-11.2%
WR	MIN	68.5%	89.8	0.267	57.6%	24.6%
RB	NE	34.7%	100.0	0.140	31.0%	-2.0%
TE	NE	18.8%	36.7	0.169	37.3%	4.3%
WR	NE	46.5%	14.9	0.144	31.7%	-1.3%
RB	NO	33.5%	94.4	0.169	39.8%	6.8%
TE	NO	16.2%	28.8	0.096	22.7%	-10.3%
WR	NO	50.3%	27.8	0.159	37.5%	4.5%
RB	NYG	27.6%	67.7	0.192	35.7%	2.7%
TE	NYG	13.6%	20.8	0.103	19.1%	-13.9%
WR	NYG	58.8%	56.7	0.243	45.2%	12.2%
RB	NYJ	16.0%	14.8	0.090	26.6%	-6.4%
TE	NYJ	16.0%	28.2	0.073	21.8%	-11.2%
WR	NYJ	68.0%	88.1	0.174	51.6%	18.6%
RB	OAK	28.8%	72.8	0.125	28.2%	-4.8%
TE	OAK	23.0%	49.6	0.171	38.5%	5.5%
WR	OAK	48.2%	20.8	0.148	33.3%	0.3%
RB	PHI	18.5%	26.0	0.108	22.4%	-10.6%
TE	PHI	39.5%	100.0	0.213	44.2%	11.2%
WR	PHI	42.1%	0.0	0.161	33.4%	0.4%
RB	PIT	14.6%	8.3	0.150	30.0%	-3.0%
TE	PIT	19.7%	39.4	0.113	22.6%	-10.4%
WR	PIT	65.7%	80.4	0.236	47.4%	14.4%
RB	SEA	21.3%	38.7	0.082	25.3%	-7.7%
TE	SEA	21.3%	44.2	0.110	34.0%	1.0%
WR	SEA	57.5%	52.4	0.132	40.8%	7.8%
RB	SF	24.4%	52.8	0.095	23.9%	-9.1%
TE	SF	22.8%	49.1	0.166	41.6%	8.6%
WR	SF	52.8%	36.4	0.138	34.5%	1.5%
RB	TB	12.7%	0.0	0.085	21.3%	-11.7%
TE	TB	18.5%	35.9	0.099	24.9%	-8.1%
WR	TB	68.8%	90.7	0.214	53.8%	20.8%
RB	TEN	21.6%	40.1	0.105	29.8%	-3.2%
TE	TEN	13.7%	21.2	0.091	25.7%	-7.3%
WR	TEN	64.7%	76.9	0.157	44.5%	11.5%
RB	WAS	26.7%	63.3	0.137	34.5%	1.5%
TE	WAS	24.8%	55.2	0.126	31.9%	-1.1%
WR	WAS	48.5%	21.7	0.133	33.6%	0.6%

---

Team TPM Sorted High to Low With Speed and Team Balance

In these tables take from the above sortable database, I present a color-coded list of teams within positions for Average TPM. Finding Teams highest in positions targeting has to be useful data for waiver wires, add/drops and trades.  Dynasty players might modify their plans to go with a Team’s flow. 

---

 Running Back

The top TPM for RBs are CAR, NYG, NO, CIN, LAC, ARI, and PIT. The clear evidence is here for moving into these teams RBs in PPR. 

The opposite situations are found in KC, SEA, ATL, TB, CLE, and GB. Consider your RB shares in these teams. 

---

Tight Ends

Tops TEs teams are KC, PHI, IND, OAK, NE, and SF. These teams use the TEs for targeting and points the way for trades etc.

Caution in using TEs from DET, LAR, NYJ, LAC, DAL, BUF and BAL. 

---

Wide Receivers

The best WRs are those used a lot and fast in targeting. These WRs can be found in MIN, DET, IND, NYG, PIT, GB, CLE, HOU, CIN, LAR, and DEN. These are key teams in PPR leagues for WRs. 

The teams with the least used WRs are DAL, BUF, SEA, WAS, SF and NE. Some surprising teams on this list. Caution. 

---

TPM with Weekly TPM Metrics vs Average TPM, TPM Rankings, Speed and Balance

This mega table contains:

• NUM
• TEAMs
• POS
• Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6
• DIFF
• POS
• TEAMs
• Average of Target_Min
• POS TPM RANK
• POS Speed of Targeting
• Balance

The Num Column is sorted from high to low by Teams and their positions. I recommend using for a Team Targeting Diagnosis.

It’s that time of the season to make a change. If you are 1-5, 2-4 or maybe 3 -3, team depth is not important. Winning now is everything. You must move from stockpiling to winning now! Trades etc are now! Do not continue to do the same things. 

 

NUM	TEAMs	POS	Week 1	Week 2	Week 3	Week 4	Week 5	Week 6	DIFF	POS	TEAMs	Average of Target_Min	POS TPM RANK	POS Speed of Targeting	Balance
1	ARI	RB	0.297	0.135	0.106	0.089	0.101	0.194	0.093	RB	ARI	0.150	59.8	30.5%	-2.5%
2	ARI	TE	0.274	0.232	0.106	0.142	0.051	0.136	0.085	TE	ARI	0.148	51.3	30.1%	-2.9%
3	ARI	WR	0.274	0.193	0.197	0.142	0.219	0.184	-0.034	WR	ARI	0.194	50.9	39.4%	6.4%
4	ATL	RB	0.126	0.084	0.119	0.103	0.049	0.063	0.015	RB	ATL	0.085	12.4	19.9%	-13.1%
5	ATL	TE	0.144	0.101	0.085	0.051	0.227	0.316	0.089	TE	ATL	0.139	46.5	32.6%	-0.4%
6	ATL	WR	0.449	0.143	0.188	0.198	0.194	0.171	-0.024	WR	ATL	0.202	56.3	47.5%	14.5%
7	BAL	RB	0.099	0.144	0.132	0.038	0.146	0.080	-0.066	RB	BAL	0.106	28.2	27.4%	-5.6%
8	BAL	TE	0.123	0.096	0.055	0.114	0.076	0.080	0.004	TE	BAL	0.090	19.8	23.1%	-9.9%
9	BAL	WR	0.121	0.203	0.265	0.136	0.295	0.166	-0.129	WR	BAL	0.192	49.9	49.5%	16.5%
10	BUF	RB	0.101	0.111	0.070	0.139	0.059	0.091	0.032	RB	BUF	0.098	21.8	31.7%	-1.3%
11	BUF	TE	0.094	0.099	0.056	0.106	0.044	0.091	0.047	TE	BUF	0.085	17.4	27.8%	-5.2%
12	BUF	WR	0.162	0.121	0.073	0.178	0.089	0.129	0.040	WR	BUF	0.125	4.7	40.5%	7.5%
13	CAR	RB	0.294	0.281	0.044		0.169	0.325	0.156	RB	CAR	0.205	100.0	41.0%	8.0%
14	CAR	TE	0.065	0.099	0.147		0.169	0.183	0.014	TE	CAR	0.130	41.8	26.0%	-7.0%
15	CAR	WR	0.131	0.206	0.118		0.148	0.213	0.065	WR	CAR	0.165	31.7	32.9%	-0.1%
16	CHI	RB	0.100	0.073	0.064	0.159		0.165	0.005	RB	CHI	0.107	28.8	27.7%	-5.3%
17	CHI	TE	0.135	0.116	0.138	0.142		0.082	-0.059	TE	CHI	0.119	35.5	30.7%	-2.3%
18	CHI	WR	0.150	0.182	0.158	0.142		0.165	0.023	WR	CHI	0.160	28.7	41.6%	8.6%
19	CIN	RB	0.147	0.126	0.345	0.132	0.114	0.279	0.165	RB	CIN	0.166	71.7	33.5%	0.5%
20	CIN	TE	0.061	0.105	0.141	0.066	0.049	0.279	0.230	TE	CIN	0.100	25.2	20.1%	-12.9%
21	CIN	WR	0.184	0.230	0.240	0.223	0.218	0.269	0.051	WR	CIN	0.230	74.9	46.3%	13.3%
22	CLE	RB	0.096	0.055	0.081	0.116	0.055	0.176	0.121	RB	CLE	0.086	13.7	19.2%	-13.8%
23	CLE	TE	0.096	0.165	0.049	0.110	0.143	0.229	0.086	TE	CLE	0.131	42.3	29.1%	-3.9%
24	CLE	WR	0.138	0.220	0.302	0.265	0.198	0.317	0.119	WR	CLE	0.233	76.9	51.7%	18.7%
25	DAL	RB	0.085	0.216	0.293	0.083	0.258	0.026	-0.233	RB	DAL	0.128	44.1	39.4%	6.4%
26	DAL	TE	0.085	0.072	0.147	0.099	0.074	0.034	-0.040	TE	DAL	0.081	15.3	25.0%	-8.0%
27	DAL	WR	0.129	0.090	0.132	0.132	0.118	0.103	-0.015	WR	DAL	0.116	0.0	35.6%	2.6%
28	DEN	RB	0.071	0.037	0.112	0.069	0.150	0.201	0.051	RB	DEN	0.103	25.8	23.1%	-9.9%
29	DEN	TE	0.057	0.166	0.118	0.165	0.075	0.201	0.126	TE	DEN	0.121	36.9	27.2%	-5.8%
30	DEN	WR	0.247	0.212	0.179	0.275	0.193	0.242	0.049	WR	DEN	0.221	69.1	49.6%	16.6%
31	DET	RB	0.186	0.208	0.057	0.103	0.094		-0.009	RB	DET	0.124	41.3	28.6%	-4.4%
32	DET	TE	0.056	0.033	0.076	0.057			-0.057	TE	DET	0.053	0.0	12.2%	-20.8%
33	DET	WR	0.353	0.340	0.146	0.205	0.250		0.045	WR	DET	0.258	93.6	59.2%	26.2%
34	GB	RB	0.094	0.068	0.119	0.058	0.100	0.075	-0.025	RB	GB	0.088	14.9	18.9%	-14.1%
35	GB	TE	0.094	0.101	0.129	0.117	0.195	0.209	0.014	TE	GB	0.141	47.6	30.3%	-2.7%
36	GB	WR	0.325	0.141	0.259	0.273	0.270	0.193	-0.077	WR	GB	0.236	78.9	50.7%	17.7%
37	HOU	RB	0.052	0.067	0.143	0.085	0.137	0.111	-0.026	RB	HOU	0.104	26.4	24.3%	-8.7%
38	HOU	TE	0.104	0.051	0.095	0.057	0.122	0.111	-0.010	TE	HOU	0.093	21.7	21.8%	-11.2%
39	HOU	WR	0.231	0.259	0.245	0.234	0.233	0.173	-0.060	WR	HOU	0.230	75.2	53.9%	20.9%
40	IND	RB	0.183	0.056	0.178	0.248	0.170	0.087	-0.082	RB	IND	0.136	49.8	23.0%	-10.0%
41	IND	TE	0.163	0.169	0.305	0.248	0.277	0.160	-0.118	TE	IND	0.212	86.1	35.8%	2.8%
42	IND	WR	0.183	0.200	0.254	0.305	0.224	0.272	0.049	WR	IND	0.244	84.5	41.2%	8.2%
43	JAX	RB	0.169	0.195	0.135	0.063	0.202	0.165	-0.036	RB	JAX	0.147	57.5	31.2%	-1.8%
44	JAX	TE	0.119	0.076	0.184	0.081	0.275	0.118	-0.157	TE	JAX	0.129	41.1	27.4%	-5.6%
45	JAX	WR	0.169	0.211	0.156	0.148	0.312	0.165	-0.146	WR	JAX	0.195	51.5	41.4%	8.4%
46	KC	RB	0.039	0.036	0.058	0.114	0.041	0.140	0.099	RB	KC	0.067	0.0	14.3%	-18.7%
47	KC	TE	0.235	0.359	0.217	0.213	0.153	0.377	0.225	TE	KC	0.237	100.0	50.5%	17.5%
48	KC	WR	0.156	0.144	0.142	0.170	0.160	0.238	0.077	WR	KC	0.165	32.0	35.2%	2.2%
49	LAC	RB	0.261	0.151	0.136	0.202	0.101	0.079	-0.022	RB	LAC	0.155	63.5	38.7%	5.7%
50	LAC	TE	0.073	0.061	0.117	0.109	0.043	0.063	0.020	TE	LAC	0.079	13.8	19.7%	-13.3%
51	LAC	WR	0.196	0.131	0.220	0.147	0.154	0.148	-0.006	WR	LAC	0.167	32.8	41.6%	8.6%
52	LAR	RB	0.123	0.059	0.102	0.220	0.169	0.142	-0.027	RB	LAR	0.122	39.6	29.3%	-3.7%
53	LAR	TE		0.059	0.058	0.037	0.119	0.114	-0.005	TE	LAR	0.073	10.8	17.5%	-15.5%
54	LAR	WR	0.304	0.234	0.243	0.294	0.169	0.135	-0.034	WR	LAR	0.222	69.9	53.2%	20.2%
55	MIA	RB	0.132	0.088	0.186	0.108	0.374	0.118	-0.256	RB	MIA	0.147	57.3	35.6%	2.6%
56	MIA	TE	0.066	0.070	0.093	0.086	0.170	0.101	-0.069	TE	MIA	0.098	24.1	23.7%	-9.3%
57	MIA	WR	0.181	0.141	0.149	0.183	0.136	0.219	0.083	WR	MIA	0.167	33.3	40.7%	7.7%
58	MIN	RB	0.144	0.140	0.192	0.047	0.051	0.044	-0.007	RB	MIN	0.096	20.4	20.6%	-12.4%
59	MIN	TE	0.043	0.140	0.144	0.109	0.092	0.117	0.025	TE	MIN	0.101	26.0	21.8%	-11.2%
60	MIN	WR	0.235	0.232	0.351	0.279	0.254	0.234	-0.021	WR	MIN	0.267	100.0	57.6%	24.6%
61	NE	RB	0.136	0.125	0.120	0.152	0.272	0.092	-0.180	RB	NE	0.140	52.9	31.0%	-2.0%
62	NE	TE	0.257	0.120	0.241	0.124	0.254	0.111	-0.143	TE	NE	0.169	62.7	37.3%	4.3%
63	NE	WR	0.112	0.194	0.161	0.103	0.160	0.145	-0.014	WR	NE	0.144	17.5	31.7%	-1.3%
64	NO	RB	0.233	0.107	0.250	0.128	0.105		-0.023	RB	NO	0.169	73.4	39.8%	6.8%
65	NO	TE	0.090	0.092	0.114	0.096	0.090		-0.006	TE	NO	0.096	23.4	22.7%	-10.3%
66	NO	WR	0.299	0.168	0.155	0.096	0.113		0.017	WR	NO	0.159	27.9	37.5%	4.5%
67	NYG	RB	0.131	0.264	0.085	0.188	0.163	0.309	0.146	RB	NYG	0.192	90.6	35.7%	2.7%
68	NYG	TE	0.098	0.140	0.056	0.103	0.122	0.109	-0.013	TE	NYG	0.103	26.7	19.1%	-13.9%
69	NYG	WR	0.361	0.176	0.178	0.274	0.295	0.209	-0.086	WR	NYG	0.243	84.0	45.2%	12.2%
70	NYJ	RB	0.045	0.142	0.069	0.180	0.035	0.041	0.006	RB	NYJ	0.090	16.2	26.6%	-6.4%
71	NYJ	TE	0.060	0.095	0.057	0.112	0.069	0.054	-0.015	TE	NYJ	0.073	10.9	21.8%	-11.2%
72	NYJ	WR	0.141	0.206	0.180	0.285	0.118	0.149	0.031	WR	NYJ	0.174	37.8	51.6%	18.6%
73	OAK	RB	0.159	0.061	0.095	0.171	0.118	0.163	0.045	RB	OAK	0.125	42.0	28.2%	-4.8%
74	OAK	TE	0.238	0.076	0.156	0.291	0.138	0.070	-0.068	TE	OAK	0.171	64.0	38.5%	5.5%
75	OAK	WR	0.095	0.159	0.130	0.257	0.148	0.098	-0.050	WR	OAK	0.148	20.4	33.3%	0.3%
76	PHI	RB	0.218	0.075	0.112	0.149	0.092	0.077	-0.015	RB	PHI	0.108	29.7	22.4%	-10.6%
77	PHI	TE	0.202	0.266	0.174	0.265	0.239	0.154	-0.085	TE	PHI	0.213	86.9	44.2%	11.2%
78	PHI	WR	0.171	0.187	0.087	0.207	0.129	0.162	0.033	WR	PHI	0.161	29.2	33.4%	0.4%
79	PIT	RB	0.156	0.073	0.198	0.289	0.137	0.200	0.063	RB	PIT	0.150	59.7	30.0%	-3.0%
80	PIT	TE	0.130	0.155	0.077	0.124	0.057	0.162	0.105	TE	PIT	0.113	32.3	22.6%	-10.4%
81	PIT	WR	0.196	0.334	0.206	0.340	0.206	0.129	-0.077	WR	PIT	0.236	79.3	47.4%	14.4%
82	SEA	RB	0.147	0.068	0.046	0.128	0.044	0.080	0.036	RB	SEA	0.082	10.3	25.3%	-7.7%
83	SEA	TE	0.141	0.195	0.122	0.048	0.082	0.032	-0.050	TE	SEA	0.110	30.7	34.0%	1.0%
84	SEA	WR	0.121	0.208	0.153	0.144	0.090	0.108	0.018	WR	SEA	0.132	9.6	40.8%	7.8%
85	SF	RB	0.069	0.113	0.089	0.110	0.087	0.104	0.017	RB	SF	0.095	20.3	23.9%	-9.1%
86	SF	TE	0.312	0.101	0.133	0.165	0.174	0.208	0.034	TE	SF	0.166	61.2	41.6%	8.6%
87	SF	WR	0.132	0.079	0.117	0.165	0.159	0.162	0.002	WR	SF	0.138	13.5	34.5%	1.5%
88	TB	RB	0.031	0.103	0.079	0.064		0.123	0.059	RB	TB	0.085	12.5	21.3%	-11.7%
89	TB	TE	0.052	0.164	0.202	0.085		0.071	-0.015	TE	TB	0.099	25.0	24.9%	-8.1%
90	TB	WR	0.137	0.246	0.261	0.208		0.238	0.030	WR	TB	0.214	64.6	53.8%	20.8%
91	TEN	RB	0.152	0.033	0.061	0.188	0.095	0.067	-0.029	RB	TEN	0.105	27.6	29.8%	-3.2%
92	TEN	TE	0.135	0.066	0.061			0.067	0.067	TE	TEN	0.091	20.4	25.7%	-7.3%
93	TEN	WR	0.270	0.140	0.079	0.248	0.153	0.119	-0.034	WR	TEN	0.157	26.5	44.5%	11.5%
94	WAS	RB	0.131	0.255	0.069		0.206	0.038	-0.168	RB	WAS	0.137	50.1	34.5%	1.5%
95	WAS	TE	0.079	0.135	0.155		0.094	0.169	0.076	TE	WAS	0.126	39.7	31.9%	-1.1%
96	WAS	WR	0.114	0.135	0.103		0.206	0.102	-0.104	WR	WAS	0.133	10.2	33.6%	0.6%

---

Positional Graphs with Average TPM and Team TPM Rankings

Focus on the top teams and move away for those teams near the bottoms of TPMs. 

---

Running Backs

Note in Targeting Speed CAR and NYG are the top 2. That is a difference from raw targets shown previously. If CAR could increase targets they would be very significant in RB targeting. FYI NO and NE had the most usages as measured by total targets. Note NO is 3rd. Thus they are a highly RB target team who are very fast in RB targeting. That is a double treat for Kamara owners. Lots of targets faster! 

---

Tight Ends

The top 3 teams in TE targeting speed are also the tops in total target usages. PHI, KC, and IND. Key Teams this year for TEs. Again lots of Targets fast! 

---

Wide Receivers

Note the top target usages using total targets is LAR, TB, and MIN. However, only LAR is in the top three of targets and targeting speed! Key fact! 

We see that DET and IND are in the top three in targeting speed for WRs. They have room to improve this season. Watch for changes in the top teams. Get a piece of the faster targeting teams. 

---