<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Working the Waiver Wire, Week 11: Kyle Orton and C.J. Anderson headline another shaky waiver crop</title>
	<atom:link href="/2014/11/11/working-waiver-wire-week-11-kyle-orton-c-j-anderson-headline-another-shaky-waiver-crop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fakepigskin.com/2014/11/11/working-waiver-wire-week-11-kyle-orton-c-j-anderson-headline-another-shaky-waiver-crop/</link>
	<description>Your One Stop Fantasy Sports Shop</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:40:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.14</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Howe</title>
		<link>http://www.fakepigskin.com/2014/11/11/working-waiver-wire-week-11-kyle-orton-c-j-anderson-headline-another-shaky-waiver-crop/#comment-945038</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin Howe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 05:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fakepigskin.com/?p=15578#comment-945038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bridgewater is a definite dynasty hold. I like his future - not a lot, but some - and as I said, the TDs will come.

For re-draft AND dynasty purposes, I don&#039;t like McCown, or Stanton. I know McCown has a favorable schedule, but he&#039;s a bad quarterback, and I make it a point not to roster guys who are flat-out bad, regardless of all of the fantasy justification measures we use. Same with Stanton, albeit to a lesser degree. Neither are startable guys even if Rivers goes down.

Mallet doesn&#039;t have the tools I look for in a QB. He&#039;s strong-armed, but immobile - not just from a running standpoint, but just in terms of avoiding pressure. However, he was plucked by a guy whose offensive mind I tend to trust (O&#039;Brien). Still, I&#039;d only look at him as a dynasty target for dirt-cheap. And I don&#039;t like his QB2 chances this year, either.

Vick and Orton are old(er) guys, and neither are likely to start next season, but I like their 2014 prospects (to a degree). Orton is playing well and has a few solid QB2+ matchups left, so he&#039;s your QB2 going forward. Vick&#039;s slate looks pretty tough, but he&#039;s always a threat to add 5-10 rushing points in any matchup, so a catastrophic Rivers injury could lead him to some value. Hard guy to bank on, though.

Long story short, I say keep Bridgewater redshirted with Orton as your backup.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bridgewater is a definite dynasty hold. I like his future &#8211; not a lot, but some &#8211; and as I said, the TDs will come.</p>
<p>For re-draft AND dynasty purposes, I don&#8217;t like McCown, or Stanton. I know McCown has a favorable schedule, but he&#8217;s a bad quarterback, and I make it a point not to roster guys who are flat-out bad, regardless of all of the fantasy justification measures we use. Same with Stanton, albeit to a lesser degree. Neither are startable guys even if Rivers goes down.</p>
<p>Mallet doesn&#8217;t have the tools I look for in a QB. He&#8217;s strong-armed, but immobile &#8211; not just from a running standpoint, but just in terms of avoiding pressure. However, he was plucked by a guy whose offensive mind I tend to trust (O&#8217;Brien). Still, I&#8217;d only look at him as a dynasty target for dirt-cheap. And I don&#8217;t like his QB2 chances this year, either.</p>
<p>Vick and Orton are old(er) guys, and neither are likely to start next season, but I like their 2014 prospects (to a degree). Orton is playing well and has a few solid QB2+ matchups left, so he&#8217;s your QB2 going forward. Vick&#8217;s slate looks pretty tough, but he&#8217;s always a threat to add 5-10 rushing points in any matchup, so a catastrophic Rivers injury could lead him to some value. Hard guy to bank on, though.</p>
<p>Long story short, I say keep Bridgewater redshirted with Orton as your backup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KB</title>
		<link>http://www.fakepigskin.com/2014/11/11/working-waiver-wire-week-11-kyle-orton-c-j-anderson-headline-another-shaky-waiver-crop/#comment-944977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fakepigskin.com/?p=15578#comment-944977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m in a dynasty salary cap league.  I have Phillip Rivers, but am looking for some QB depth down the stretch this year and also down the road.  I&#039;ve got Michael Vick, Ryan Mallet and Orton now, but McCown, Stanton and Bridgewater are all available via waivers.  If you had to pick 2 of those guys out of the 6, who would you take for now and the future?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in a dynasty salary cap league.  I have Phillip Rivers, but am looking for some QB depth down the stretch this year and also down the road.  I&#8217;ve got Michael Vick, Ryan Mallet and Orton now, but McCown, Stanton and Bridgewater are all available via waivers.  If you had to pick 2 of those guys out of the 6, who would you take for now and the future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
